← Library
Madras High CourtWP/11368/2025disposed of

A.Naveed Mohammed v. The Inspector General Of Registration

2025-03-28Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 28.03.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH A.Naveed Mohammed S/o.Ayub ... petitioner Vs

1. The Inspector General of Registration 100, Santhome High Road Raja Annamalaipuram Chennai-600 028.

2. The Sub-Registrar Palacode Dharmapuri District.

3. Vanthi W/o.Late Ramaru

4. Datchayani W/o.Anand ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to entertain and register the sale deed or any other deeds in respect of the land belonging to the petitioner and measuring an extent of 20.5 cents in Survey No.583/A1D2 situated at Erranahalli Village, Palacode Taluk, Dharmapuri District.

1/4

For Petitioner :

Mr.A.M.Esakkiappan For Respondents :

Mr.K.Karthick Jagannath Government Advocate for R1 and R2 *****

O R D E R

This writ petition has been filed seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the second respondent to entertain and register the sale deed executed by the petitioner with respect to the subject property and to release the same.

2. Heard Mr.A.M.Esakkiappan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.K.Karthick Jagannath, learned Government Advocate for R1 and R2.

3. The petitioner is claiming the right and title over the subject property by virtue of a registered settlement deed dated 25.09.2023 registered as Document No.3915 of 2023. The petitioner wanted to deal with the subject property and hence, he executed a sale deed and the same was not entertained by the second respondent on the ground that there is a pending suit in O.S.No.108 of 2024 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Palacode and that an objection has been received in this 2/4

regard.

4. In the considered view of this Court, mere pendency of the suit cannot be a ground to refuse the registration of a sale deed. Law on this issue was settled by this Court in A.Abdullasa v. Inspector General of Registration and others [2021 (2) CWC 451]. At the best, such a sale will be subject to the rule of lis pendens.

5. In view of the above, in the absence of any restraint order passed by the competent Civil Court, the second respondent has to entertain the sale deed and register the same, if it is otherwise in order. The Writ Petition is disposed of in the above terms. There shall be no order as to costs.

28.03.2025 Index: Yes/no Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order mk 3/4

N.ANAND VENKATESH, J mk To

1. The Inspector General of Registration 100, Santhome High Road Raja Annamalaipuram Chennai-600 028.

2. The Sub-Registrar Palacode Dharmapuri District.

28.03.2025 4/4