← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/20531/2015dismissed

Chelladurai v. State Rep By

2015-11-27Honourable Mr Justice R.Subbiah3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 27.11.2015

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH Crl.O.P.No.20531 of 2015 and M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2015 1.Chelladurai 2.Padmini ... Petitioners Vs.

1.State represented by The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station (south), Tiruppur City, (Crime No.3 of 2015) 2.Nithiya ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code praying to call for the records and quash the proceedings pending against the petitioners in C.C.No.559 of 2015 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Tiruppur.

For Petitioners : Mr.H.Rajasekar For Respondents : Mr.C.Emalias, APP (For R1) Mr.Abdul Majeed (for R2)

ORDER

This petition has been filed seeking to quash the criminal proceedings in C.C.No.559 of 2015 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Tiruppur, against the petitioners. The petitioners herein have been arrayed as accused 2 & 3 in the said case.

2.The 2nd respondent/defacto-complainant is the daughter-in-law of the petitioners herein. She lodged a complainant as against her husband Subash/A1, as well as against her father-in-law and mother-in-law, who are the

petitioners herein. After completion of investigation, final report was submitted by the 1st respondent-police, stating that after the marriage between the 1st accused and the defactocomplainant, the defacto-complainant lived in the matrimonial home along with the petitioners herein. After delivery of a child, the defacto-complainant and her husband/A1 started to live in a separate house and the 1st accused/husband harassed her by demanding Rs.50 lakhs for his business. The defactocomplainant was beaten by the 1st accused/husband and further, the 1st accused/husband wanted the consent of the defactocomplainant for his second marriage; but the same was resisted by the defacto-complainant.

3.The chargesheet has been filed by the 1st respondentpolice under Section 492A & 323 IPC and the same was taken on file in C.C.No.559 of 2015 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Tiruppur. Now, the petitioners have come forward with the present petition seeking to quash the chargesheet as against them.

3A.The prosecution has filed counter stating that the petitioners herein, along with the 1st accused, harassed the defacto-complainant; thus, opposed to quash the criminal proceedings as against the petitioners.

4.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, the learned counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent/defacto-complainant as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the prosecution. 5.It is the only submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners that the entire allegation has been made only as against the husband of the defacto-complainant and not against the petitioners herein. But, a perusal of the complaint/chargesheet, I find that at the relevant point of time, the defacto-complainant and her husband were living along with the petitioners herein. The allegations were also made against the petitioners herein stating that the petitioners herein along with the 1st accused harassed the defacto-complainant. Hence, it is incorrect to state that there is no allegation against the petitioners herein.

6.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners have not made out a case to quash the impugned criminal proceedings. The submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, at the maximum, could be their defence during the course of trial. Hence, I am not inclined to quash the impugned criminal proceedings.

In fine, the criminal original petition fails and the same is dismissed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

Sd/ ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(CS-III) /TRUE COPY/ SUB-ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ssv To, 1.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station (south), Tiruppur City, (Crime No.3 of 2015) 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

3. The Judicial Magistrate, No.II, Tiruppur.

4. Do thro' The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tiruppur.

+1 CC to MR.Abdul Majeed Advocate. SR.NO.64706 +1 CC to MR.H.Rajasekar Advocate. SR.NO. 64602 Pre-delivery order in Crl.O.P.No.20531 of 2015 and M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2015 CO-VS JD 11/12/2015