C.Jeevananantham v. The District Manager
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 29.08.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU W.P.No.22223 of 2018 and W.M.P.No.26049 of 2018 C.Jeevananantham, S/o.Chokkapala Nadar, 21, Moovendar Nagar, 1st Street, Pammal, Chennai - 600 075.
..Petitioner Vs 1.The District Manager, TASMAC Ltd.
Kancheepuram (North), Kancheepuram District.
2.The District Manager, Thirumazhisai Unit (III), No.1, Bangalore Highways Road, Chembarambakkam Village, Thiruvallur District - 600 123.
..Respondents PRAYER:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other direction or order more in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS directing the 2nd respondent herein to implement the directions issued by the 1st respondent by its communication dated 07.07.2018 in Na.Ka.No.4416/A6/2018.
For Petitioner :
Mr.S.Vijayakumar For Respondents:
Mr.P.Arumugarajan, Standing counsel for R1 and R2
ORDER
Mr.P.Arumugarajan, learned Standing Counsel takes notice for the respondents. By consent of the parties, the main writ petition is taken up for final disposal.
2. The writ petition is filed for a mandamus directing the 2 nd respondent to implement the directions issued by the 1st respondent dated 07.07.2018, wherein and whereby, the 2nd respondent was directed to locate the IMFL retail shop in the subject matter premises.
3. Heard both sides.
4. The petitioner is a landlord of the subject matter premises bearing Door No.98 J.N. Road, Anagaputhur, Chennai. The https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
grievance of the petitioner is that the respondents, having taken the said premises on lease from the petitioner for locating the IMFL retail shop, has not located the same so far, nor they paid the rent to the petitioner as well. It is the case of the petitioner that the 1st respondent has already directed the 2nd respondent to locate the said shop in the said premises through proceedings dated 07.07.2018. As the shop is not located so far, the petitioner has approached this Court and filed the present writ petition.
5. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents, based on instructions, submitted that the subject matter shop will be located in the said premises within a period of four weeks and therefore, the petitioner need not have any apprehension. Therefore, he submitted that the writ petition may be disposed of by recording the above said submission.
6. Considering the above stated facts and circumstances and considering the submission made on behalf of the 2nd respondent as stated supra, this writ petition is disposed of by recording the above said submission. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-IX) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vsi/krk To 1.The District Manager, TASMAC Ltd.
Kancheepuram (North), Kancheepuram District.
2.The District Manager, Thirumazhisai Unit (III), No.1, Bangalore Highways Road, Chembarambakkam Village, Thiruvallur District - 600 123.
+1cc to Mr. S.Vijaya Kumar, Advocate, S.R.No. 59369 W.P.No.22223 of 2018 VGI(CO) GN(17/09/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/