Ajithkumar @ Thoda v. The Inspector Of Police

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J.

The petitioner who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b),324 and 506(2) and 307of I.P.C in Crime No.69 of 2023, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution as per the defacto complainant is that he fell in love with one Roshin who is the relative of A1/Sunwessels, due to which the said A1/Sunwessels and the petitioner assaulted the defacto complainant and caused injuries to him. Hence the case.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he is a friend of A1, due to which he has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that it is a case in counter. Hence he seeks for anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent Police would submit that the petitioner and A1/Sunwessels assaulted the defacto complainant and caused injuries to him. He further submitted that the injured has been discharged from the hospital. Hence he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

6. Taking into consideration the facts of the case and the submissions of the learned Counsel for the parties and the fact that the injured discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. 7.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on her appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ponneri on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent

police or the police officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that: [a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[b] the petitioner shall stay at Dindivanam, and report before the Dindivanam Town police Station daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders; [c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid

down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC; 25.04.2023 smn

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J.

smn 25.04.2023