Madras High CourtWP/9474/2020dismissed as infructuous

A.Rohini v. The Government Of Tamilnadu

2022-11-04Honourable Mr Justice P. N. Prakash,Honourable Mr Justice Rmt. Teekaa Raman5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 04..11..2022 Coram The Honourable Mr. Justice P.N.PRAKASH and The Honourable Mr. Justice RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN Writ Petition No.9474 of 2020 & W.M.P.Nos.11578, 14214, 14213 and 14216 of 2020 and Writ Petition No.9475 of 2020 & W.M.P.No.11579 of 2020 W.P.No.9474 of 2020 A.Rohini ..... Petitioner -Versus1.The Government of Tamil Nadu, rep. By its Secretary to Home Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.

.... Respondents

PRAYER in W.P.No.9474 of 2020: This Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents 2 and 3 from passing orders against the petitioner's husband namely A. Aravinth, S/o. Arumugam, aged about 26 years, now confined at Central Prison, Trichy, by detaining him under the preventive detention in particularly Tamil Nadu Act No.14 of 1982.

W.P.No.9475 of 2020 A.Prabhavathi ..... Petitioner -Versus1.The Government of Tamil Nadu, rep. By its Secretary to Home Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009. .... Respondents PRAYER in W.P.No.9475 of 2020: This Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents 2 and 3 from passing orders against the petitioner's husband namely S.Ananth, Son of Singaram, aged about 29 years, now confined at

Central Prison, Trichy, by detaining him under the preventive detention in particularly Tamil Nadu Act No.14 of 1982.

For Petitioner(s) : Mr.S.Parthasarathi for petitioner in both Writ Petitions For Respondents : Mr.Muniyapparaj, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondents in both Writ Petitions COMMON ORDER When these writ petitions were taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petitions have become infructuous and therefore, the writ petitions may be dismissed. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. In view of the submission made by the learned cousnel for the petitioner, these writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No cost. Consequently, connected MPs are closed.

(P.N.P., J.) (TKR., J.) 04..11..2022 Index: yes/no kmk

To 1.The Secretary to Home Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.

4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

P.N.PRAKASH.J., AND RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN.J., kmk 04..11..2022