K.C.Ramu v. Sarumathi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 12/11/2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL C.R.P.(PD)NO.1630 OF 2022 and C.M.P.NOS.5030, 5033, 5040, 5043 & 5044 of 2025 K.C.Ramu ... Petitioner/Petitioner/ 9th Defendant Vs.

1.Sarumathi ...1st Respondent/ 1st Respondent /Plaintiff 2.K.C.Anbalagan Lakshmi Ammal (dead) 3.K.V.Ramamurthi 4.K.V.Kumar 5.K.V.Nagaraj 6.K.V.Saravanan 7.Jeevarathinam 8.Usha Rani ... Respondents 2 to 8/ Respondents 2 to 9 Defendants 10 to 13 Page No.1 of 4

9.R.Narayanan 10.J.Sathyavani 11.C.Kalavathi 12.R.Subramani ... Respondents 9 to 12/ Respondents 10 to 13 Defendants 10 to 13 PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950, praying to set aside the Order dated December 09, 2021 in I.A.No.1 of 2021 in O.S.No.23 of 2010 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Thirupathur.

For Petitioner :

Died - No appearance

O R D E R

When the matter was taken up for hearing on October 31, 2025, Ms.S.Sridevi, learned counsel appearing for the Revision Petitioner submits that she has "no instructions". To that effect, she has filed a memo dated October 17, 2025 before the Registry and in addition, she has made an endorsement in the case file.

2.The memo dated October 17, 2025 is hereby recorded. Page No.2 of 4

3.Further, this Court directed the Registry to print the name of the Revision Petitioner in the cause list.

4.As directed, today the Revision Petitioner name is printed in the cause list. Despite name printed, there is no representation on behalf of the Revision Petitioner. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default. Consequently, connected civil miscellaneous petitions are also dismissed for default. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to costs. 12/11/2025 Index : Yes / No Speaking Order : Yes / No : Yes / No pam To The Subordinate Judge, Thirupathur.

Page No.3 of 4

R. SAKTHIVEL, J.

pam C.R.P.(PD)NO.1630 OF 2022 12/11/2025 Page No.4 of 4