Bombay Burma Trading Corpn. v. 1. Secretary,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 28.11.2017 CORAM :

The Hon'ble Mr.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR W.P. No.14063 of 2000 and W.M.P.No.20353 of 2000 1.The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd., Oothu Estate, Nalumukku P.O. 627 427 Tirunelveli District rep by its Head - Legal & Personnel, Mr.Divakaran Moorkath.

2.Divakaran Moorkath Head - Legal & Personnel, Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd., Mudis P.O., Coimbatore District.

.. Petitioners Vs.

1.State of Tamil Nadu, rep by Secretary to Government, Labour & Employment Dept., Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.

2.The Inspector of Plantations, Nagercoil.

3.Packialakshmi 4,Annamarial 5.Vellammal 6.Muthulakshmi 7.Soosaiammal 8.Mallika 9.Tahirabeevi 10.Letchmikutty 11.Annapushpam 12.Seetha 13.Nesam 14.Mappammal 15.Pushpeshwari 16.Mookkammal 17.Nallathai 18.Munniammal 19.Shanthi 20.Thangammal

21.Santha 22.Ramalakshmi 23.Vellammal 24.Sankarammal 25.Valliammal 26.Fathimabeevi 27.Saraswathi 28.Pechiammal 29.Gulshambeevi 30.Nabasheth 31.Malathi 32.Shakeerabanu 33.Lourthammal 34.Jebamani 35.Vijaya 36.Petchi 37.Kunjubaby 38.Seetha 39.Zeenath 40.Baghyalakshmi 41.Poomani 42.Chitra 43.Kannithai 44.Shanthi 45.Fathima 46.Krishnammal 47.Noorjehan 48.Arputham 49.Amalaselvi 50.Anthoniamma 51.Amudha 52.Usha 53.Sujatha 54.Jayakali 55.Joice Yesuvadial 56.Sabeena 57.Lakshmi 58.Shailaja 59.Theresammal 60.Kunjammal 61.Pappa 62.Regina Mary 63.Chanthirakala 64.Bella 65.Rani 66.Yeshodha 67.Lourthusamy 68.Sundaram 69.Karuppasamy 70.Raja 71.Subbiah 72.Arockiadass 73.Jameel 74.Devasagayam

75.Thangamani 76.Saravanakumar 77.Marimuthu 78.Christopher 79.Philip 80.Paramasivan 81.Manikandan 82.Arumugam 83.Ganeshan 84.Arulraj 85.Savarimuthu 86.Muthusamy 87.Mohammad 88.Samadhanamuthu 89.Muthupandi 90.Abhiranathan 91.Mariaraj 92.Ganeshan 93.Anthonisamy 94.Raja 95.Kailasam 96.Mani 97.Maria Anthony 98.Samuthirapandy 99.Jeyachandran 100.Samuthiravel 101.Manikandan 102.Rajendran 103.Selvakumar 104.Lakshmi 105.Rajkumar 106.Thresammal 107.Charlotte 108.Shanmugavalli 109.Samuthirakani 110.Packiadass 111.Radhamani 112.Ajitha Baby 113.Fathima 114.Selvi 115.Krishnammal 116.Mariammal 117.Sara 118.Boomathi 119.Maniprabha 120.Shakeela Kumari 121.Palaniamma 122.Krishnammal 123.Mallika 124.Leela 125.Esakiammal 126.Jamila 127.Ayeshabeghum 128.Sindhubath

129.Jeyamary 130.Geetha 131.Indira 132.Vennila 133.Marial 134.Sethupathy 135.Jeyanbu 136.Pachiammal 137.Moideen Meera 138.Muthulakshmi 139.Arockiamary 140.Fathima 141.Rajeshwari 142.Nesammal 143.Chidambaram 144.Chandrakala 145.Prakasi 146.Thamariselvi 147.Uma Sariba 148.Eashwari 149.Subbuthai 150.Marjula .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issue of Writ of certiorari calling for the records of the second respondent in proceedings No.Na.Ka.540/99 dated 10.9.1999 and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Parthiban For Respondents: Ms.Vasudha Thiagarajan, AGP for RR1 and 2 Ms.L.Kavitha for Mr.J.

Saravanavel for RR3,4,7,8, 9 to 13, 18, 20, 22, 23, 26 to 30, 33 to 35, 37 to 39, 43 to 46, 49 to 52, 56, 59, 61 to 63, 67 to 69, 70 to 75, 77, 79 to 88, 91, 93, 95, 97 to 100, 103, 106, 109, 110, 112, 113, 115, 117, 119, 120, 122 to 127, 132, 133, 136, 138, 139, 141 to 146, 148, 149 and 150 No appearance for RR 104, 24, 89, 121, 111, 15, 17, 19, 5, 21, 42, 65, 118, 60, 31, 147, 140, 131, 135, 129, 102, 53, 64, 25, 96, 32, 99, 98, 92, 6, 58, 54, 57, 16 and 114.

ORDER

Mr.R.Parthiban, learned counsel appears for the writ petitioners. Learned counsel for writ petitioners submits that a batch of writ petitions pertaining to the same issue came up before a learned Single Judge of this Court and the learned Single Judge dismissed all the writ petitions by a common order dated 29.01.2010 made in W.P.Nos.2329, 2330, 2331, 2332, 2333,14026, 7516, 7552 and 7517 of 2000, 4874 to 4878 of 2001, 8338 to 8340 of 2001, 18292, 18302, 18307, 18314, 26084 of 2001, 7298 and 7304 of 2000, 26969 of 2003, 17768 of 2004, 7004 of 2000 and 22799 to 22802 of 2001.

Mr.R.Parthiban, learned counsel very fairly submits that the facts and issues arising in this case are squarely covered by the aforesaid judgment. In fact, learned counsel submits that the instant writ petition, i.e., W.P.No.14063 of 2000 was left out in the batch.

In the light of the aforesaid submission, holding that the order of the learned Single Judge dated 29.01.2010 made in the aforesaid batch of writ petitions will operate as an order in this writ petition also, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-VI) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vvk To 1.The Secretary to Government, State of Tamil Nadu, Labour & Employment Dept., Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.

2.The Inspector of Plantations, Nagercoil.

+ 1 cc to the Government Pleader Sr.85675 + 1 cc to Mr.R. Parthiban, Advocate sR.84671 + 1 cc to Mr.J. Saravanavel, Advocate Sr.84593 W.P.No.14063 of 2000 AR-VI EU(19/12/2017)