S.Uma Maheswari, v. The Tahsildar,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 11.09.2015 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH W.P.No.19044 of 2015 Tmt.S.Uma Maheswari ... Petitioner Vs.

The Tahsildar, Triplicane Taluk, Triplicane, Chennai - 5.

... Respondent PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent to consider and pass orders on merits by disposing the written representation made by the petitioner on 7.11.2014 within a stipulated time.

For Petitioner : Mr.C.Prakasam For Respondent : Mr.S.Diwakar, Additional Government Pleader

ORDER

Learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent submitted that representation dated 7.11.2014 made by the petitioner has been considered and rejected by the respondent.

2. In view of the submission made by the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent, the writ petition is dismissed. However, liberty is given to the petitioner to challenge the order of rejection passed by the respondent. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

usk To The Tahsildar, Triplicane Taluk, Triplicane, Chennai - 5.

+1cc to Mr.C.Prakasam, Advocate, S.R.No.50056 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.50013 W.P.No.19044 of 2015 KGK(CO) CA(01/10/2015) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/