← Library
Madras High CourtCMA/1622/2007withdrawn dismissed

Commissioner Of Central v. M/S.Sree Lakshmi Steel

2016-07-12Honourable Mr Justice S. Manikumar,Honourable Mr Justice D. Krishnakumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated: 12.07.2016 C O R A M The Honourable Mr.Justice S.Manikumar and The Honourable Mr.Justice D.Krishnakumar CMA No.1622 of 2007 The Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai .

...

Appellant Vs M/s.Sree Lakshmi Stee Re-Rolling Mills, Chennai ...

Respondent Prayer:

Appeal filed against the Final Order No.502/2005 dated 28.03.2005, which was served upon the appellant on 03.05.2005 on the file of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench, Chennai confirming the Order dated 27.10.2003 made in Order-in-Appeal No.143/2003 (MI) on the file of Commissioner of Central Excise, (Appeals), Chennai to set aside the same.

For appellant :Mr.A.P.Srinivas Sr. Standing Counsel for Central Excise.

J U D G M E N T

(Judgment of the Court was made by S.Manikumar,J) This Appeal has been filed against the Final Order No.502 of 2005 dated 28.03.2005 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench at Chennai.

2. The substantial questions of law raised in the instant appeal are:- "a. Whether the Commissioner (Appeals) and the Appellate Tribunal are right in reducing the penalty from Rs.4,19,124/- to Rs.5,000/- when the said penalty was imposed in accordance with Rule 96ZP(3) of Central Excise Rules, 1944, as the respondent has committed default in the payment of duty?.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

b. Whether the Commissioner (Appeals) and the Appellate Tribunal have not improperly exercised their judicial discretion in reducing the penalty?"

3. On this day, when the matter came up for hearing, Mr.A.P.Srinivas, learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the Department submitted that on the basis of the instructions given in Circular No.I/10/10/2016 Legal, dated 21/3/2016, appellant department has instructed him to withdraw the appeal.

4. Placing on record the above submission, while dismissing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.1622 of 2007, as withdrawn, substantial questions of law raised are left open. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.Commissioner of Central Excise(Appeals) Chennai.

2.Customs of Excise and Service Tax Appellant Tribunal, South Zonal Branch, Chennai.

CMA No.1622 of 2007 ssk[co] srg 02/08/2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/