Madras High CourtWP/10331/2020withdrawn dismissed

Dr.S.Rathnakumar v. The Union Of India

2020-09-25Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 25.09.2020

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH WP No.10331 of 2020 and WMP No.12560 of 2020 Dr.S.Rathnakumar ..Petitioner Vs.

1. The Union of India, Rep. By its Principal Secretary, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Nirman Bhavan, New Delhi - 110 001.

2. The Employees State Insurance Corporation, Rep. By its Assistant Director General, Medical Division, IV HQRS Office, Panchadeep Bhavan, CIG Marg, New Delhi - 110 001.

3. ESIC Medical College & PGIMSR, Rep. By its Dean, Ashok Pillar Road, K.K.Nagar, Chennai 600 078.

4. The Tamil nadu Medical Council , Rep. By its Registrar, No.914, Poonamallee High Road, Arumbakkam, Chennai 600 106.

5. The Selection Committee, Directorate of Medical Education, No.162, E.V.R.Periyar Salai, Kilpauk, Chennai - 600 010.

6. The Medical Council of India Rep. By its Secretary, Pocket No.15, Sector No.8, Dwaraka Phase - I New Delhi - 110 077 ..Respondents Prayer:- Writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Declaration declaring that the bond extracted by the ESI Corporation from the parents of the petitioner during the course of admission in MBBS prescribing five year compulsory service and

unconditionally as illegal and to relieve the petitioner from all liabilities that may arise from the above execution of bond service.

For Petitioner : Mr. M.Jayaraman For Respondent : M/s.Poonam Chopra learned counsel for R1 Mr.K.Prabakar learned counsel for R2 & R3 Mr.G.Sankaran learned counsel for R4 Mr.Abdul Saleem learned counsel for R5 Mr.V.P.Raman learned counsel for R6

ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has availed the benefit of the revised circular issued by ESI Corporation on 28.07.2020 and the clarification Memorandum dated 06.08.2020 and therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition.

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, M/s.Poonam Chopra, learned counsel for 1st respondent, Mr.K.Prabakar, learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of the ESI Corporation; Mr.G.Sankaran, learned counsel appearing on behalf of 4th respondent ; Mr.Abdul Saleem, learned counsel appearing for 5th respondent and Mr.V.P.Raman, learned counsel for 6th respondent.

Taking into consideration the subsequent development and also of the fact that the petitioner is availing of the subsequent clarification issued by the ESI Corporation, this writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To