Packiaraj v. Shajakhan

S.A.No.329 of 2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 18.04.2024

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN S.A. No. 329 of 2022 and C.M.P.No.6849 of 2022 1.Packiaraj 2.Sathiyaraj (Major) [2nd appellant declared as major and mother Poongavanam discharged from his guardianship vide court order dt.01.04.2022 made in C.M.P.No. 5650 of 2022 in S.A.SR.No.47945 of 2021] ... Appellants -Vs1.Shajakhan 2.Kasim ... Respondents Prayer : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree made in A.S.No.99 of 2006 dated 26.02.2021 on the file of the learned Additional Sub Judge, Kallakurichi, reversing the judgment and decree in O.S.No.908 of 1998 dated 07.10.2005 on the file of the learned Principal District Munsif, Kallakurichi.

For Appellants : No appearance ******* 1/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

S.A.No.329 of 2022 RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN, J.

nvi

J U D G M E N T

When the matter was taken up for hearing on 04.04.2024, there was no representation for the appellants and the Registry was directed to list this matter under the caption 'for dismissal' on 18.04.2024. 2.Today, when the matter is called, none appeared on the either side. Inspite of the matter being listed under the caption 'for dismissal'. This shows that the counsels are not interested in prosecuting the case. Therefore, this Court has no other way except to dismiss the same as default. Hence, this Second Appeal is dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 18.04.2024 nvi Index: Yes / No Speaking order / Non speaking order To

1. The Additional Sub Judge, Kallakurichi

2. The Principal District Munsif, Kallakurichi. S.A. No. 329 of 2022 and C.M.P.No.6849 of 2022 2/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis