Sathiya v. The District Collector
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 31.08.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.No. 22355 of 2018 Sathiya ... Petitioner Vs
1. The District Collector, Thiruvannamalai District, Thiruvannamalai.
2. The District Revenue Officer, Thiruvannamalai District, Thiruvannamalai.
3. The Divisional Officer, Thiruvannamalai District, Thiruvannamalai.
4. The Thasildar, Kalasapakkam Taluk, Kalasapakkam, Thiruvannamalai District.
5. The Thasildar, Jamunamarathur Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District.
6. Amarani
7. Gopal @ Prabakaran
8. Sasi @ Sasikumar
9. Ramu ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of Mandamus, directing the the 3rd and 4th respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 30.1.2017 thereby direct the 4th respondent to include the petitioner name in the Revenue
records as a joint owner of the properties based on the Decree in O.S. No.469 of 2010 dated 15.6.2011 and I.A.No.347 of 2013 in O.S.No.469 of 2016 dated 30.9.2006 on the file of the District Munsiff Court, Polur within a stipulated period of time. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Sundara Pandiyan For Respondents: Mr.J.Ramesh, Additional Government pleader
ORDER
By consent of both parties, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. 2.The petitioner has come up with this writ petition seeking a direction to the 3rd and 4th respondents to consider her representation dated 30.01.2017 and consequently direct the 4th respondent to include her name in the Revenue records as a joint owner of the properties based on the Decree in O.S. No.469 of 2010 dated 15.6.2011 and I.A.No.347 of 2013 in O.S.No.469 of 2016 dated 30.9.2006 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Polur within a stipulated period of time.
3.According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, pursuant to decree in O.S. No.469 of 2010 dated 15.6.2011 and I.A. No.347 of 2013 in O.S.No.469 of 2016 dated 30.9.2006 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Polur, the petitioner approached the authorities by representation dated 30.01.2017 to include her name in the revenue records, but the same is yet to be disposed of. Hence, the petitioner is before this Court. 4.Mr.J.Ramesh, learned Additional Government Pleader who takes notice for respondents 1 to 5, submits that such representation would be considered on merits. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, this Court directs the respondents 1 to 5 to consider the representation dated 30.01.2017 made by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders, on merits and in accordance with law, after affording due opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner as well as any of the interested parties within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
6.Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.
Sd/- Deputy Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vga To
1. The District Collector, Thiruvannamalai District, Thiruvannamalai.
2. The District Revenue Officer, Thiruvannamalai District, Thiruvannamalai.
3. The Divisional Officer, Thiruvannamalai District, Thiruvannamalai.
4. The Thasildar, Kalasapakkam Taluk, Kalasapakkam, Thiruvannamalai District.
5. The Thasildar, Jamunamarathur Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District.
+1cc to Mr.B.Sundarapandian, Advocate Sr.59998 +1cc to the Government Pleader Sr.60578 W.P.No.22355 of 2018 srg 12/09/2018