Priya v. The State Of Tamilnadu, Rep By
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 08.04.2024
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI Crl.O.P.No.8608 of 2024 Priya ... Petitioner Vs.
State Rep by.
The Inspector of Police Vridhachalam Police Station, Cuddalore District.
Crime No. 122 of 2024 ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C., pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail in crime No. 122 of 2024, on the file of respondent police.
For Petitioner : Mr.Deepan Uday For Respondent : Mr.V.Meganathan, B.A., B.L., Government Advocate (Crl. Side) 1/5
O R D E R
The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 26.04.2024 for the alleged offences punishable under Sections Section 379 IPC in crime No. 122 of 2024 on the file of the respondent, seeks bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner snatched five sovereigns of gold chain in temple festival. Hence, the case.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. On the other side, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) submits that snatched chain was recovered from the petitioner.
4. Considering the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner and also stolen property was recovered from the petitioner. Hence, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
5. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand 2/5
only) with two sureties ( one must be a blood surety), each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate - I, Virudachalam, Cuddalore, and on further conditions that:
[a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;
[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two months.
[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial 3/5
Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];
[f] If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.
08.04.2024 pbl 4/5
T.V.THAMILSELVI,J.
pbl To
1. The Judicial Magistrate - I, Virudachalam, Cuddalore.
2. The Inspector of Police Vridhachalam Police Station, Cuddalore District.
3. The Central Prison, Coimbatore.
4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.
Crl.O.P.No.8608 of 2024 08.04.2024 5/5