← Library
Madras High CourtWP/24179/2017disposed of

Mr.S.Sampath v. The Inspector General Of

2017-09-08Honourable Mr Justice M.Duraiswamy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 08.09.2017

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY W.P.No.24179 of 2017 S.Sampath

...Petitioner

v.

1.The Inspector General of Registration Santhome, Chennai - 600 008 2.The District Registrar, Administration South Madras, Saidapet Chennai - 600 015 3.The Joint Sub - Registrar - II Saidapet, Chennai - 600 015 4.R.Jegadeeswari ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 23.11.2016 based on the direction of the 1st respondent in letter No.17455/U2/2016, dated 22.04.2016 and another letter No.54782/U2/2016, dated 14.12.2016, by virtue of circular No.67, dated 03.11.2011 of the 1st respondent, within the time frame that may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Arokia Maniraj For Respondents: Mr.S.N.Parthasarathy Government Advocate - for R1 to R3

O R D E R

Mr.S.N.Parthasarathy, learned Government Advocate, takes notice for the respondents 1 to 3 . By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.

2. The petitioner has filed the above writ petition to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to consider his representation dated 23.11.2016 based on the direction of the 1st respondent dated 22.04.2016 and another letter dated 14.12.2016, by virtue of circular No.67, dated 03.11.2011, within the time frame.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that in spite of the petitioner's representation dated 23.11.2016, the 2nd respondent has not passed any order so far.

4.Mr.S.N.Parthasarathy, learned Government Advocate, appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 submitted that the 2nd respondent may be directed to consider the petitioner's representation and pass orders, in accordance with law, after giving notice to the 4th respondent.

5. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side , without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, I direct the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 23.11.2016 and pass orders, in accordance with law, after giving notice to the 4th respondent, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. With this observation, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CCC) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar Rj To 1.The Inspector General of Registration Santhome, Chennai - 600 008 2.The District Registrar, Administration South Madras, Saidapet Chennai - 600 015 3.The Joint Sub - Registrar - II Saidapet, Chennai - 600 015.

+ 1 cc to Government Pleader SR.65646 + 1 cc to M/s. S. Arokia Maniraj, Advocate SR.65266 W.P.No.24179 of 2017 NM(CO) EU(21/09/2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/