← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/9238/2025granted

Kannan Alias Panni Rajesh v. State Rep By

2025-03-27Honourable Mr Justice Sunder Mohan5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 27.03.2025

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Crl.O.P.No.9238 of 2025 Kannan @ Panni Rajesh ... Petitioner/Accused-1 Vs.

The State represented byThe Inspector of Police, T-15, SRMC Police Station, Avadi District.

(Crime No.70 of 2025) ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail, in connection with the Crime No.70 of 2025 pending investigation on the file of the respondent Police. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Saranraj For Respondent : Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 21.02.2025, seeking bail in Crime No.70 of 2025 registered for the offences under Sections 8(c) & 20(b)(ii)(B) of the NDPS Act, 1985.

1/5

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was found in illegal possession of 1.200 kilograms of ganja. Hence, the case. 3.Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case; that the contraband was seized and that the petitioner is in custody from 21.02.2025 and hence, he may be released on bail.

4.Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police while opposing the grant of bail to the petitioner, reiterated the prosecution case and on instructions submitted that the contraband has been seized from the petitioner and that the petitioner has 11 previous cases, out of which one case is similar in nature.

5.Considering the period of incarceration and the fact that the petitioner is on bail in all the previous cases and the contraband seized is an intermediate quantity and since further custody is not required for the purpose of interrogation, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

2/5

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Poonamallee.

[a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police, daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders; [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

3/5

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.

27.03.2025 rkp To

1. The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Poonamallee. 2.The Inspector of Police, T-15, SRMC Police Station, Avadi District.

3. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Puzhal.

4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 4/5

SUNDER MOHAN., J.

rkp Crl.O.P.No.9238 of 2025 27.03.2025 5/5