Frangling M.S.Santhi v. The State Rep By Its Inspector Of Police
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 19.05.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH CRL.O.P.NO.10245 OF 2022
1. Frangling M.S.Santhi Wife of Jayaraj
2. Yesuraja S/o.S.Selvadhasan Soosaimariyan
3. Antony ARasan Son of Jayaraj
4. Andrew Arun Son of Jayaraj ... Petitioners .Vs.
1. The State, Rep. by its Inspector of Police, Thiruvottiyur Police Station, Washermenpet, Chennai.
2. Jayaraj Son of Thanganadar.
... Respondents PRAYER:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records pertaining to Crime No.281 of 2022 pending on the file of the 1st respondent and quash the same by allowing the present criminal original petition.
For Petitioners :
Mr.R.Jayaprakash For Respondents :
Mr.E.Raj Thilak Additional Public Prosecutor For R1
Mr.S.Suganth Sam Abraham For R2
O R D E R
The Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the FIR in Crime No.281 of 2022, pending on the file of the 1st respondent.
2. The case is still at the stage of investigation. The parties have decided to bury their hatchet and compromise the dispute amicably among themselves.
3. The Affidavit dated 16.05.2022 has been filed by the 2nd respondent/de facto complainant before this Court. In order to identify the respective parties they have also produced the copies of the Aadhaar Card and it is made part of the record. In the affidavit, it has been stated that the petitioners and the second respondent have entered into a compromise and amicably settled their issues in Crime No.281 of 2022. This Court also enquired both the parties and was satisfied that the parties have come to an amicable settlement between themselves.
4. Under such circumstances, no useful purpose will be served in keeping the First Information Report pending, even though, the offences involved are not compoundable in nature. In the light of the guidelines given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in 2017 9 SCC 641-(Parbathbhai Aahir @ Parbathbhai Vs. State of Gujrath), and after exercising due caution as advised by the Hon'ble Suprme Court in The State of Madhya Pradesh v. Dhruv Gurjar and Another reported in (2019) 2 MLJ Crl 10, this Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashes the First Information Report in Crime No.281 of 2022, on the file of the 1st respondent Police.
5. This Criminal Original Petition stands allowed and as a sequel, the proceedings in Crime No.281 of 2022, on the file of the 1st respondent police, is quashed and the terms of affidavit shall form part and parcel of this order. [ The petitioner shall pay a sum of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) as costs, to the credit President, Tamil Nadu Advocates Clerk Association, Madras High Court, Chennai (Indian Bank, High Court Branch, A/c No.484026006, IFSC Code:IDIB000M157), within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this
order and file a photocopy of the receipt along with a memo reporting compliance in the Registry].
Sd/- Vacation Officer //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar mk To 1.
The Inspector of Police, Thiruvottiyur Police Station Washermenpet, Chennai.
2.
The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
3.
The President, The Tamil Nadu Advocates Clerk Association, Madras High Court, Chennai.
+2ccs to Mr.R.Jayaprakash, Advocate, S.R.No.31615 +1cc to Mr.S.Suganth Sam Abraham, Advocate, S.R.No.31643 CRL.O.P.NO.10245 OF 2022 JPL(CO) PBS/20/05/2022