Ramamurthy Naidu v. Narayanaswamy Naidu

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED:13.06.2018

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN S.A.No.1010 of 2004 and C.M.P.No.7410 of 2004 Ramamurthy Naidu ... Appellant vs.

1.Narayanaswamy Naidu 2.Rajulu Naidu 3.Radhakrishna Naidu ... Respondents Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the decree and judgment dated 24.12.2003 in A.S.No.50 of 2003 on the file of the First Additional Sub Court, Cuddalore reversing the judgment and decree dated 31.03.2003 in O.S.No.482 of 1998 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Cuddalore.

For Appellant :No appearance For Respondents :Mr.V.Raghavachari J U D G E M E N T Learned counsel for the respondents present.

2.In this Second Appeal, learned counsel for the appellant had already reported no instructions and also made an endorsement to that effect and the appellant being called, remaining absent, Registry was directed to list the matter today, i.e., on 13.06.2018, under the caption " for dismissal", by printing the name of the appellant in the cause list. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3.Today, when the matter is called, there is no representation for the appellant. Appellant called absent. 4.Resultantly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for nonprosecution with costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition, if any, is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VI) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The First Additional Sub Judge, First Additional Sub Court, Cuddalore.

2.The Additional District Munsif, Additional District Munsif Court, Cuddalore.

3.The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Chennai. [2 copies] S.A.No.1010 of 2004 na[co] srg 26/06/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/