Pon Muniammal, Duraichamypuram v. The State Of Tamil Nadu Rep.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated: 22.08.2016 Coram:

The Honourable Mr.SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE and The Honourable Mr.Justice R.MAHADEVAN W.P.No.650 of 2010 Pon Muniammal ... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Tamilnadu represented by The Secretary, Revenue Department,The Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009.

2.The Land Commissioner, Land Reforms, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai.

3.The Assistant Commissioner, Land Reforms, Thirunelveli, Thirunelveli District. 4.The District Collector, Tuticorin District, Tuticorin.

5.The Tahsildar, Vilathikulam Taluk, Vilathikulam, Tuticorin District.

6.Jeyalakshmi (R6,R7 impleaded as per order of this court on 12.01.2010 in WP 650/10 R8 and R9 are substituted in the place of deceased R7 as per order dated 05.11.2015 in MP No.2/2015 in WP 650/2010).

7.Kamu Reddy (Died) 8.Pappuraj Reddy (Struck off vide order 22/08/2016) 9.K.Sekar Reddy Order made in MP 2/2015, dated 05.11.2015 has been recalled vide order Dated 06.01.2016 made in WP 650/2015 by CJ & PSNJ.

R8 is continued to be impleaded in the individual capacity as per order dated 06.01.2016 by CJ and PSNJ in WP 650/2010.

... Respondents

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarfied Mandamus, to call for the records in MR4/455A/VKM dated 06.02.2008 of the 3rd respondent and quash the same and consequently to direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents to cancel the proceedings in the notification of the 3rd respondent in MR 4/15 - LI/VKM dated 15.11.2006 which has been mentioned in the connected order of the 3rd respondent in MR4/455A/VKM dated 06.02.2008. For Petitioner ::: No appearance For Respondents ::

Mr. M.K.Subramanian Government Pleader for R.1 to R.5

O R D E R

(The Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble The Chief Justice) None appears for the petitioner.

2. Since the petitioner has not taken steps to bring the legal heirs of 8th respondent on record, we have finally dismissed that application. That means effectively respondent No.8 is struck off from the array of parties.

3. The writ petition is thus dismissed for non-prosecution, leaving the parties to bear their own costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CCC) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To

1. The Secretary, Revenue Department, The Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009. 2.The Land Commissioner, Land Reforms, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai.

3.The Assistant Commissioner, Land Reforms, Thirunelveli,

Thirunelveli District.

4.The District Collector, Tuticorin District, Tuticorin.

5.The Tahsildar, Vilathikulam Taluk, Vilathikulam, Tuticorin District.

1 cc to Government Pleader, sr.47696 W.P.No.650 of 2010 scd co kra 08/09/2016