← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/11619/2020dismissed

R.Jegan v. State Rep By

2020-08-04Honourable Mr Justice A.D.Jagadish Chandira5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 04.08.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA R.Jegan S/o.Ragavan Big Street, Mamandur Village & Post, Vembakkam Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District.

... Petitioner Vs.

State Represented by :- The Inspector of Police, Dusi Police Station, Thiruvannamalai District.

... Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C., praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.1331 of 2020,pending investigation on the file of the Respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Punniakoti For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz, Additional Public Prosecutor 1/5

O R D E R

(The case has been heard through video conference) The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 379, 430 of IPC and r/w 21(5) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulations) Act 1957 in Crime No.1331 of 2020, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. It is the case of the prosecution that the petitioner is alleged to have transported four units of sand illegally by using Lorry without any valid licence. Hence the complaint.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 2/5

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent submitted that the quantity of sand involved is four units. He further submitted that there there are seven previous cases pending against the petitioner. Hence, he opposed for the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Taking into consideration the allegations and also the bad antecedent of the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 04.08.2020 Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Speaking/Non-Speaking order tta 3/5

To, 1.The Inspector of Police, Dusi Police Station, Thiruvannamalai District.

2.The learned Judicial Magistrate, Cheyyar.

3.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai.

4/5

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA,J.

tta Crl.O.P.No.11619 of 2020 04.08.2020 5/5