Gopalakrishnan v. State Rep By

T.V.THAMILSELVI,J.

The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 324, 427 and 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.157 of 2024, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 29.03.2024, when the defacto complainant was loading bricks, the petitioners interfered with the loading work and there was a wordy quarrel, during which the petitioners damaged JCB, attacked the defacto complainant with a stick and pelted stone and also threatened with dire consequences. Hence, the complaint.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they are the brothers family of the defacto complainant and they have already pending civil suit in respect of family property belonged to the father Mohanasundaram, for which, RDO enquiry was also conducted. He further submits that they have nothing to do with the

alleged offence and it is a case and a case in counter. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the defacto complainant was loading bricks, the petitioners interfered with the loading work and there was a wordy quarrel, during which the petitioners damaged JCB, attacked the defacto complainant with a stick and pelted stone and also threatened with dire consequences. Hence, he vehemently opposed for the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5.Taking into consideration the facts of the case and the submissions made by the learned counsels, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order before the learned Judicial

Magistrate No.I, Poonamallee, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, with two sureties, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: (a)the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Court concerned may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

[b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation; [c] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[e] on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions has been imposed and the petitioner is released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

drl [f] if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC;

10.04.2024 drl