Jagadeeswari, v. K.Sivasankar,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED:08.06.2018

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN S.A.No.1039 of 2004 Jagadeeswari ...Appellant/2nd Defendant Vs.

1.K.Sivasankar 2.Jothivanitha Mani 3.Vanaja 4.Kanda alias Kandamani 5.Thillai 6.Sini alias Srinivasan

...Respondents

Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the decree and judgment of the learned II Additional Judge, City Civil Court at Madras made on 19.09.2003 in A.S.No.74 of 2001 preferred as against the judgment and decree made in O.S.No.1313 of 1992 dated 30.10.2000 on the file of the XVII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court at Madras. For Appellant : No appearance For Respondents : No appearance

J U D G M E N T

No representation for the respondents. No representation for the appellant. Appellant called absent.

2.It is found that, despite several adjournments, proper steps had not been taken by the learned counsel for the appellant to bring the L.Rs of the deceased first respondent on record and proceed with the Appeal. Thus, it is found that the appellant has not been ready to prosecute the Appeal properly. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3.In such view of the matter, it is not justifiable to continue the Appeal further. In view of the above position, the second appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition, if any, is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar mfa To

1. The II Additional Judge, City Civil Court at Madras. 2.The XVII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court at Madras. Copy to The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Chennai. (2 copies) S.A.No.1039 of 2004 nmi(CO) TR(22/06/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/