Madras High CourtWP/19898/2015disposed of

P.Thirunavukarasu, v. The Tahsildar,

2015-07-07Honourable Mr Justice M. Sathyanarayanan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 07-07-2015

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN WRIT PETITION No.19898 of 2015 P.Thirunavukarasu .. Petitioner vs The Tahsildar Thirutani Taluk Thiruvallur District Thiruvallur .. Respondent Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 1.8.2013, and to change the name in the computer patta issued by the respondent vide Patta No.303 to incorporate the petitioner's great grandfather's name as Munusamy Mudaliar instead of Rajam Ethiraj and for patta No.1294, to incorporate the petitioner's great grandfather's name as Munusamy Mudaliar, son of Gopal, instead of Mudaliar - Salakathiammal and Ethiraj father Gopal. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Chandrasekar For Respondent : Mr.M.Digvijaya Pandian Additional Government Pleader

ORDER

By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.

2.The petitioner would state that his great grandfather viz. Munusamy Mudaliar, owned lands in Survey Nos.250/15A1, 250/6B, 257/26 and 257/3 vide Patta No.303, and Survey No.257/2 vide Patta No.1294 issued by the respondent and during the course of patta entry in the computer, in respect of the above said properties, wrong entries have been made as to the name of the persons, as Rajam Ethiraj, son of Gopal, instead of Munusamy Mudaliar, son of Gopal Mudaliar for patta No.303 and as Mudaliar, son of Salakathiammal and Ethiraj father Gopal, instead of Munusamy Mudaliar, son of Gopal, for patta No.1294, and in this regard, he submitted a representation dated 1.8.2013, and his statement was recorded by the Village Administrative Officer, Thirutani, on 5.8.

2013, and the Revenue Inspector, Thirutani Taluk, has called the petitioner as well as the parties interested for enquiry and accordingly, the petitioner appeared and his statement was also recorded on 17.8.2013, and thereafter, nothing has happened, and hence, he came forward to file this writ petition. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.

3.Heard the submissions of Mr.P.Chandrasekar, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, and Mr.M.Digvijaya Pandian, learned Additional Government Pleader, who accepted notice on behalf of the respondent.

4.This Court, without going into the merits of the claim projected by the petitioner, directs the respondent to consider the issue relating to the correction of name in the computer patta, in respect of the above said properties in question, and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible and not later than six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after putting on notice, the persons concerned, and communicate the decision taken, to the petitioner as well as to the persons concerned. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar nsv To:

The Tahsildar Thirutani Taluk Thiruvallur District Thiruvallur +1cc to Mr.P. Chandrasekar, Advocate, S.R.No.34040 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.34336 GJ(CO) EU(16/07/2015) W.P.No.19898 of 2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/