Madras High CourtCRL OP/11939/2020dismissed

Syed Mohamad Ikram @ Mohamad Syed Ikram v. The State Rep. By

2020-08-07Honourable Mr Justice A.D.Jagadish Chandira2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 07.08.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Crl.OP.No.11939 of 2020 Syed Mohamad Ikram @ Mohamad Syed Ikram ...petitioner/A2 Vs.

The State rep.by, The Inspector of Police , Saravanapetty Police Station, Coimbatore District, ( Crime No.1231 of 2020) ... Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C., praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.1231 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr. C. Ganesh Pandian For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz, Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

(This case has been heard through video conference) The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Section 392 and 397 of IPC in Crime No.1231 of 2020, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution as per the defacto complainant is that on 23.05.2020 when he and his friend were staying in OYO Lodge, the petitioner and other accused persons robbed cash and other valuable articles from them at knife point. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the entire statement of the prosecution is a cooked up story and the petitioner is a innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioner is a notorious criminal. He has 7 previous cases of similar nature and he along with other accused persons induced the defacto complainant and other persons to stay at lodge for prostitution and thereafter posing as policemen and threatened the defacto complainant and robbed cash and valuable articles. Hence, he vehemently opposed for grant of Anticipatory bail to the petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5.Taking into consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and the above submission so made by the Additional Public Prosecutor that the petitioner has 7 previous cases to his credit, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. -sd/- 07/08/2020 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT-II, COIMBATORE.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

3 INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SARAVANAPATTY POLICE STATION, COIMBATORE DISTRICT.

CC to M/S. C.GANESH PANDIAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.11939/2020 Date :07/08/2020 RVR 17/09/2020 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/