Madras High CourtCRL OP/276/2018disposed of

Senbagavalli,52 Yrs, v. State Rep By,

2021-01-20Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 20.01.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH Crl.O.P No.276 of 2018 and Crl.MP No.11450 of 2018 and Crl.OP No.277 of 2018 in Crl MPNo.11449 of 2018 Senbagavalli ... Petitioner in Crl.OP No.276 of 2018 Arumugam ... Petitioner in Crl.OP No.277 of 2018 vs.

1. State rep. By The Inspector of Police, Muthialpet Police Station, 2.Mandaadi Indrasena Reddy Founder Managing Trustee OVMO Trust -NGO, No.12, Francis Xavier street, Kurusukuppam,Puducherry - 12 ... Respondent / Defacto complainant

COMMON PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records in connection with F.I.R in Crime No.100 of 2017 (in Crl OP No.276 of 2018 and Crime No.99 of 2017 (in Crl OPNo.277 of 2018) pending on the file of the Inspector of Police, Muthialpet Police Station, For Petitioners : Mr.T.Gnana Banu in both Crl OPs For Respondents : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz in both Crl OPs Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

These petitions have been filed to call for the records in Crime No.100 of 2017 and Crime No.99 of 2017 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Muthialpet Police Station, Puducherry.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Criminal Side), appearing on behalf of the respondents.

3.The contentions put forward by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners are purely factual in nature

and this Court cannot venture into conducting a mini investigation into the matter and it therefore, does not fall within the ambit of its jurisdiction under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. Any finding on facts will also have a bearing on the investigation conducted by the respondent Police. It is also seen from records that the respondent police is investigating a case and counter in Crime No.100 of 2017 and Crime No.99 of 2017.

4. In the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the investigation conducted by the respondent Police at this stage.

5. In the result, this Criminal Original Petitions are dismissed and the respondent Police is directed to proceed further with the investigation in accordance with law and complete the investigation and file a final report or a closure report, as the case

may be, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

20.01.2021 Index: Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order rka To

1. State rep. By The Inspector of Police, Muthialpet Police Station, 2.Mandaadi Indrasena Reddy Founder Managing Trustee OVMO Trust -NGO, No.12, Francis Xavier street, Kurusukuppam,Puducherry - 12

2. The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras.

N. ANAND VENKATESH, J.

rka Crl.O.P No.276 of 2018 and Crl.MP No.11450 of 2018 and Crl.OP No.277 of 2018 in Crl MPNo.11449 of 2018 20.01.2021