← Library
Madras High CourtWA/1065/2012dismissed

V. Vanaja v. The Inspector General Of

2017-02-22Honourable Mr Justice S. Manikumar,Honourable Mr Justice M. Govindaraj3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 22.02.2017 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR and THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ W.A.No.1065 of 2012 M.P.No.1 of 2012 V.Vanaja ... Appellant vs.

1. The Inspector General of Registration, Department of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Chennai.

2. The District Revenue Officer (Department of Registration) No.32, Rajaji Salai, Chennai-1.

3. The Sub-Registrar, Department of Registration, Anna Nagar, Chennai-40.

... Respondents Writ appeals filed under clause 15 of the Letters Patent filed against the order of this Court made in W.P.No.9072 of 2012, dated 18.04.2012.

WP.9072 of 2012 Prayer: This Writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the impugned order dated 3/2012 passed by the second respondent vide his proceedings in Na. Ka. C.Pa. No.A3/79/11 and quash the same. For Appellant :

No appearance For Respondent :

Mr.T.M.Pappiah, Spl. Govt. Pleader

JUDGMENT

(Judgement of this Court was delivered by S.MANIKUMAR, J.) Writ appeal is directed against the order made in W.P.No.9072 of 2012, dated 18.04.2012.

2.

On 15.02.2017, we passed the following orders, "On the basis of an affidavit, dated 08.12.2016 of Mr.P.Dinesh Kumar, learned counsel on record, Mr.D.Ravichandran, learned counsel submitted that appeal was entrusted by the husband of the appellant. Matter was listed for final hearing. Appellant was put on notice through e-mail, dated 01.11.2016, sent to her husband and through Speed Post, dated 02.11.2016, seeking further instructions, enabling the counsel to proceed further. There was no reply for the e-mail and Speed Post was returned with the endorsement "Intimation Delivered - Door Locked". As there is no instructions from the appellant, vide affidavit, dated 08.12.2016, he has requested the Court to record the same and pass further orders.

2. Registry is directed to delete the name of the counsel for the appellant. Registry is further directed to print the name of the appellant and post the same on 17.02.2017."

3.

On 17.02.2017, though the name of the petitioner was shown in the cause list, there was no appearance, either in person or through counsel. Hence, we directed the Registry to post the matter on 22.02.2017 and thus, it is listed today. 4.

Even today, there is no representation, either in person or through counsel. In the abovesaid circumstances, we are constrained to dismiss this appeal.

5.

Hence, this Writ Appeal is dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is also closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// skm Sub Assistant Registrar

To 1 THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION NO. 100 SANTHOME HIGH ROAD CHENNAI 2 THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER (DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION) NO.32 RAJAJI SALAI CHENNAI 1 3 THE SUB REGISTRAR DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION ANNA NAGAR CHENNAI 40 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.11448 LRS(CO) RS(16/03/2017) W.A.No.1065 of 2012