Madras High CourtWP/24353/2017disposed of

V.Sekar, v. The Secretary,

2017-09-13Honourable Mr Justice S.M. Subramaniam3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 13.09.2017

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.24353 of 2017 V.Sekar ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The Secretary, Labour and Employment Department, Fort St., George, Chennai-9.

2. The Commissioner of Labour, Trade Union, Teynampet, Chennai - 18.

3. The Deputy Commissioner of Labour (South), Teynampet, Chennai - 18.

4. The Labour Officer No.3, Kuralagam, Chennai - 108.

5. The Secretary, Registration Department, Fort St., George, Chennai-9.

6. The Inspector General of Registration, Santhome, Chennai - 28.

7. The District Registrar, Saidapet, Chennai - 15.

8. M/s South India Cine & T.V. Outdoor Unit Technician's Union Represented by its President, No.2, Gangadharan Street, Dr.Ambedkar Nagar, Saligramam, Chennai - 93.

9. M/s South India Cine & T.V. Outdoor Unit Technician's Union Represented by its Secretary, No.2, Gangadharan Street, Dr.Ambedkar Nagar, Saligramam, Chennai - 93.

10.M/s South India Cine & T.V. Outdoor Unit Technician's Union Represented by its Joint Secretary, No.2, Gangadharan Street, Dr.Ambedkar Nagar, Saligramam, Chennai - 93.

... Respondents

Prayer:

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents herein to consider the representation dated 03.06.2017 and to take initiate necessary action against the Respondents 8 to 10 herein in accordance with law and pass orders.

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Mohanakrishnan For RR 1 to 7 : Mr.K.Dhananjayan Special Government Pleader For RR 8 to 10 :

No Appearance

O R D E R

The relief sought for in this writ petition is for a direction to direct the respondents to consider the representation submitted by the writ petitioner on 03.06.2017, in relation to the un-labour practice being adopted by the respondents 8 to 10.

2. The learned counsel for the writ petitioner made a submission that the respondents 8 to 10 are adopting the unlabour practice and threatening and preventing the members and non-members from accepting the employment. The writ petitioner made a representation to the second respondent on 03.06.2017 and the same is yet to be considered. The livelihood of the writ petitioner is affected and in view of this urgency, an order of direction is required.

3. Thus, without going into the merits of the case, the second respondent is directed to consider the representation submitted by the writ petitioner on 03.06.2017 and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

4. The writ petition stands disposed of. No order as to cost in this writ petition.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS V) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar