Madras High CourtWP/12470/2018disposed of

Sri Grama Devatha Kottai v. The District Collector,

2020-02-28Honourable Mr Justice R. Mahadevan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 28.02.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.No.12470 of 2018 and WMP.No.14610 of 2018 Sri Grama Devatha Kottai Mariayamma Temple Deveopment and Car Festival Trust, Rep. by its President/Trustee B.R.Muralikumar, ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The District Collector, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.

2. The District Revenue Officer, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.

3. The Sub-Collector, Hosur, Krishnagiri District.

4. The Superintendent of Police, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.

5. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Hosur, Krishnagiri District.

6. The Tahsildar, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District.

7. The Inspector of Police, Bagalur Police Station, Hosur, Krishnagiri District.

8. The Revenue Inspector, Bagalur Village, Hosur, Krishnagiri District.

9. The Village Administrative Officer, Bagalur Village, Hosur, Krishnagiri District.

10. Appaji Shetty,

11. Jayaraman

12. Ravikumar

13. Krishnappa

14. Manjunath Chetty

15. Chinna Venkatramanappa

16. Pradeep

17. Abbaiah Naidu

18. Venkatram

19. Sathyanarayanan

20. Muniraj ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents 6 to 9 from interfering with the construction of Sri Grama Devatha Kottai Mariayamma Temple in S.No.300, Bagalur Village, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District by the petitioner trust by considering the petitioner's representation dated 26.04.2018. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Jayaprakash For Respondents : Mr.D.Suriyanarayanan, AGP for R1 to R9.

: Mr.E.Omprakash, Senior Counsel for Mr.R.Ezhilarasan for R10 to 16, 18 and 20

O R D E R

When the matter was taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submitted that the relief sought for herein has become infructuous and hence, nothing survives for adjudication in this writ petition. 2.In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VI) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar av