Vishwa v. The Inspector Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 23.04.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN 1.Vishwa 2.Guna 3.Anand

...Petitioners/Accused 1 - 3

Vs.

State rep by The Inspector of Police, Ambattur Estate Police Station, Chennai.

(Crime No.129 of 2025) ...

Respondent PRAYER: This criminal original petition has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS to enlarge the petitioners on bail in Crime No.129 of 2025 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioners :

Mr.R.Moovendran For Respondent :

Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Government Advocate (Crl. Side) Page No.1 of 6

ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioners, who were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 13.03.2025, seeking bail in Crime No.129 of 2025 registered for the offence under Sections 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), 324(2), 125, 311 and 351(3) of BNS, 2023. 2.It is the case of the prosecution that when the defacto complainant was in his food stall, the petitioners came there and demanded money to have liquor; that when the defacto complainant refused the same, the petitioners had abused him in filthy language, assaulted him, threatened him of dire consequences and robbed Rs.685/- at knife point. Hence, the case. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent; that the petitioners have no bad antecedents and that the petitioners are in custody from 13.03.2025 and hence, further custody of the petitioners is not required and sought for bail. 4.Per contra, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the petitioners have no bad antecedents.

Page No.2 of 6

5.Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record.

6.Considering the nature of allegations, period of incarceration, the fact that the petitioners have no bad antecedents and since further custody of the petitioners is not required for the purpose of investigation, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. 7.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail on their executing separate bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) each with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, Ambattur, and on further conditions that:

[a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent Police, everyday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders; Page No.3 of 6

[c] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[d] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.

23.04.2025 ata Page No.4 of 6

Copy to:

1.The Inspector of Police, Ambattur Estate Police Station, Chennai.

2.The Judicial Magistrate, Ambattur.

3.The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison - II, Puzhal, Chennai.

4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

Page No.5 of 6

SUNDER MOHAN, J.

ata 23.04.2025 Page No.6 of 6