← Library
Madras High CourtWP/2438/2017dismissed as infructuous

V.Sherlin, v. The Govt. Of Tamil Nadu,

2018-08-01Honourable Mr Justice Satrughana Pujahari3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 01.08.2018

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATRUGHANA PUJAHARI W.P.No.2438 of 2017 1.V.Sherlin 2.V.Sreedevi 3.S.Salini 4.K.S.Jayachitra 5.R.P.Sreekala 6.A.Indira 7.C.Thanammal 8.K.S.Nagalakshmi 9.K.Bindhu 10.R.Prema ..

Petitioners Vs

1. Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Home (Police HI) Department, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009

2. The Director General of Police, Police Head Quarters, Kamarajar Salai, Chennai 600 005

3. The Additional Director General of Police(Admin), Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai 600 004

4. The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board, No.4, 9th Cross Street, Indira Nagar, Adyar, Chennai 60 0020 .. Respondents Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to draw a seniority list of the Sub-Inspectors recruited for the year 2001-2002 based on the marks secured in the training and consequently direct the respondent No.1 to 4 to place the petitioners in the appropriate position in the seniority list and promote them to the post of inspector of

Police (Taluk) based on seniority list drawn with all consequential benefits.

For Petitioners : Mr.K.Sampath Kumar For Respondents : Mrs.Narmadha Sampath, Additional Advocate General-8, Asst. by Mr.V.Kadhirvelu, Special Government Pleader

ORDER

This writ petition was filed seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to draw a seniority list of the SubInspectors recruited for the year 2001-2002 based on the marks secured in the training and consequently direct the respondent Nos.1 to 4 to place the petitioners in the appropriate position in the seniority list and promote them to the post of Inspector of Police (Taluk) based on seniority list drawn with all consequential benefits.

2. This writ petition was kept pending in order to comply the direction given by this Court on 27.06.2017 to draw the final seniority list and as such seniority list has now been drawn which has also been challenged in many writ petitions filed today by some of the persons aggrieved.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the fact that final seniority list has been drawn by the respondent concerned the petitioners wants to withdraw this writ petition and the same be disposed of as infructuous and the petitioners be given liberty to challenge the same if aggrieved.

4. Considering the fact that final seniority list has been drawn in pursuance of the direction of this Court, as nothing survives in this writ petition, this Court disposes of this writ petition as infructuous keeping the petitioners' right reserved in case of challenging the final seniority list. However, in the circumstances there shall be no order as to costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS V) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar lok

To

1. The Secretary to Government, Government of Tamil Nadu, Home (Police HI) Department, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009

2. The Director General of Police, Police Head Quarters, Kamarajar Salai, Chennai 600 005

3. The Additional Director General of Police(Admin), Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai 600 004

4. The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board, No.4, 9th Cross Street, Indira Nagar, Adyar, Chennai 60 0020 +1cc to Mr.K.Sampath Kumar, Advocate, S.R.No.53419 W.P.No.2438 of 2017 KGK(CO) CS/05/09/18