Manoharan v. State Rep.By Its

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED:02.07.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.PONGIAPPAN H.C.P.No.764 of 2021 Manoharan ..Petitioner Vs.

1.State represented by The Superintendent of Police, Coimbatore District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Sultanpettai Police Station, Coimbatore District.

..Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus to directing the respondents for the production of the petitioner's wife Nithiya, aged about 29 years, son Kathirvel, aged about 6 years and daughter Lakshita, aged abut 4 years, before this Court and set them at liberty forthwith.

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Kalimuthu For Respondents : Mr.R.Muniyapparaj Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side)

ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by P.N.PRAKASH, J.] This habeas corpus petition has been filed seeking to direct the respondents for the production of the petitioner's wife Nithiya, aged about 29 years, son Kathirvel, aged about 6 years and daughter Lakshita, aged abut 4 years, before this Court and set them at liberty forthwith.

2.

When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the petitioner's https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

wife and children were secured by the police on 12.05.2021 and they were produced before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Sulur. 3.

The learned counsel for the petitioner also conceded the same.

In view of the above, this habeas corpus petition stands closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy in accordance with law.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar nsd To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Coimbatore District.

2. The Inspector of Police, Sultanpettai Police Station, Coimbatore District.

3. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai - 600 104.

H.C.P.No.764 of 2021 AJS(CO) RGA(30/07/2021) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/