← Library
Madras High CourtWP/22512/2018disposed of

Mr.Arul David, Rep By His v. The Commissioner For

2018-09-03Honourable Mr Justice R. Mahadevan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 03.09.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.No. 22512 of 2018 Arul David .. Petitioner Vs

1. The Commissioner for Revenue Administration, Chepauk, Chennai-5.

2.The District Revenue Officer, Erode, Erode District.

3.The Sub Collector, Gobichettypalayam, Erode District.

4.The Thasildar, Sathyamangalam Taluk, Sathyamangalam, Erode District.

5.The Inspector of Police, Bhavanisagar Police Station, Sathyamangalam, Erode District. .. Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to pass orders on the revision petition dated 10.07.2018 which was preferred challenging the order passed by the second respondent in Proceeding Na.Ka.32376/2016/U2 dated 21.11.2017 confirming the order passed by the third respondent in Na.Ka.7594/2016/A3 dated 03.02.2017.

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Raja For Respondents : Mrs.P.Rajalakshmi, Additional Government Pleader

ORDER

By consent of both parties, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

2.The petitioner has come up with this writ petition seeking a direction to the first respondent to pass orders on the revision petition dated 10.07.2018 preferred by him challenging the order passed by the second respondent in Proceeding Na.Ka.32376/2016/U2 dated 21.11.2017 confirming the order passed by the third respondent in Na.Ka.7594/2016/A3 dated 03.02.2017.

3.According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner has preferred a Revision Petition dated 10.07.2018 claiming issuance of patta, but, the same is yet to be disposed of by the first respondent. Hence, the petitioner is before this Court. 4.Mrs.P.Rajalakshmi, learned Additional Government Pleader taking notice for the respondents, submitted that the first respondent be directed to consider the petitioner's Revision Petition and pass orders in accordance with law.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, this Court directs the first respondent to consider the petitioner's Revision Petition dated 10.07.2018 and pass appropriate orders, on merits and in accordance with law, after affording due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as any of the interested parties, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6.Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. 03.09.2018 Index: Yes/No vga R.MAHADEVAN, J.

vga To

1. The Commissioner for Revenue Administration, Chepauk, Chennai-5.

2.The District Revenue Officer, Erode, Erode District.

3.The Sub Collector, Gobichettypalayam, Erode District.

4.The Thasildar, Sathyamangalam Taluk, Sathyamangalam, Erode District.

5.The Inspector of Police, Bhavanisagar Police Station, Sathyamangalam, Erode District.

W.P.No. 22512 of 2018

03.09.2018