Madras High CourtCRP/1448/2009dismissed as settled out of court

Bhoruka Steel Ltd v. Manba Ul Ula Society

2015-12-18Honourable Mr Justice M.Duraiswamy4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 18.12.2015

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE THIRU JUSTICE M. DURAISWAMY C.R.P.(NPD)Nos.1448 & 4229 of 2009 & M.P.Nos. 1 & 1 of 2009 Bhoruka Steel Ltd.

Rep. By its Branch Manager Office at 179, Thambu Chetty Street Chennai ... Petitioner in both CRPs v.

Manba-ul-ula-Society Rep. By its Secretary Office at No.43, Chinnapalli Street Koothanallur Nagai-Quaid-e Millath District.

... Respondent in both CRPs C.R.P.(PD)Nos.1448/2009 filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the decree and judgment dated 29.04.2009 made in E.P.No.295 of 2005 in O.S.No.7665 of 1995 on the file of IX Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.

C.R.P.(PD)Nos.4229/2009 filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the decree and judgment dated 31.12.2008 made in E.A.No.7557 of 2008 in E.P.No.295 of 2005 in O.S.No.7665 of 1995 on the file of IX Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai. For Petitioner : Ms. G.Thilagvathi For Respondent : Mr.S.Muthukumar COMMON ORDER Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the parties had settled the matter out of court and also entered into a memorandum of compromise dated 10.02.2015. Mr.K.Murali, General Manager of the petitioner company is also present today, who also acknowledged the due execution of the memorandum of compromise dated 10.02.2015. The learned counsel further submitted that though the parties had signed the memorandum of compromise dated 10.02.2015, the same has been exchanged between the parties, the same has not been produced before this court and only a copy of the memorandum of compromise has been produced before this court

2. In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner sought the permission of this

court to withdraw the Civil Revision Petitions as settled out of court and to that effect she has also made an endorsement in the memorandum of grounds in the Civil Revision Petitions.

3. In view of the same, the above Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed as settled out of court. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

18.12.2015 Index : No Internet : Yes Rj To The IX Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.

M. DURAISWAMY,J., Rj C.R.P.(nPD)Nos.1448 & 4229 of 2009 & M.P.Nos. 1 & 1 of 2009 18.12.2015