Madras High CourtCRP/2705/2018dismissed as infructuous

Aandal v. V.G.P Housing (Pvt Ltd.,)

2020-12-11Honourable Mr Justice R. Subramanian4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 11.12.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN Anandal .. Petitioner Vs.

1. V.G.P.Housing Private Limited, Company having registered office at VGP Square, No.6 Dharmaraja Kovil Road, Saithapet Post, Chennai.

Rep. By its Managing Director, G.Santhosam, VGP Square, No.6 Dharmaraja Kovil Road, Saithapet Post, Chennai.

2. G.Santhosam, Chairman V.G.P.Housing Private Limited, Company having registered office at VGP Square, No.6 Dharmaraja Kovil Road, Saithapet Post, Chennai.

3. V.G.Selvaraj, Vice Chairman/Director Company having registered office at VGP Square, No.6 Dharmaraja Kovil Road, Saithapet Post, Chennai.

4. V.G.P.Ravidas, Director V.G.P.Housing Private Limited, 1/4

Company having registered office at VGP Square, No.6 Dharmaraja Kovil Road, Saithapet Post, Chennai.

5. V.G.P. Rajadas, Director, V.G.P.Housing Private Limited, Company having registered office at VGP Square, No.6 Dharmaraja Kovil Road, Saithapet Post, Chennai.

6. V.G.P.Babudas, Director, V.G.P.Housing Private Limited, Company having registered office at VGP Square, No.6 Dharmaraja Kovil Road, Saithapet Post, Chennai.

7. M.R.Thirugnanasambandam,

8. Rajammal

9. Parimalam

10. Yasodha ..Respondents (R-7 to R-10 ex-parte before the Trial Court. Hence, they were given up) PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, praying to set aside the fair and final order dated 05.03.2018 in I.A.No.954 of 2017 in O.S.No.126 of 2009 on the file of Sub Court, Perundurai.

2/4

For Petitioners : Ms.J.Prithvi for M/s.S.Kaithamalai Kumaran For Respondents : Mr. S.Rajalakshmi for M/s.Shivakumar and Suresh for RR 1, 2, 4, 5, 6 No appearance R3

ORDER

This matter is taken up for hearing through Video-Conferencing. Ms.J.Prithvi, learned counsel appearing for M/s.S.Kaithamalai Kumaran, for the petitioner would submit that the Civil Revision Petition have become infructuous, since the suit itself has been disposed of.

2. Recording the said statement the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

11.12.2020 jv Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No Speaking order/Non Speaking order 3/4

R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.

jv To

1. The Sub Court, Perundurai.

2. The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court of Madras.

11.12.2020 4/4