Madras High CourtCONT P/738/2019closed

K.Jagannathan v. Gandhi Nagar Club

2019-04-30Honourable Mr Justice R. Subramanian3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 30.04.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN Contempt Petition No.738 of 2019 K.Jagannathan, S/o.T.T.Krishnan, Residing at New No.T-11, 32nd Cross Street, Besant Nagar, Chennai 600 090.

... Petitioner

Versus

1.M/s.Gandhi Nagar Club, Rep. by its President & Honorary Secretary, V.Shivakumar, No.73, B.Ramachandra Adhithanar Salai, (Formerly 4th Main Road), Gandhi Nagar, Adyar, Chennai - 600 020.

2.Mahesh V Shanbhag, Hony. Secretary, Gandhi Nagar Club, 3.D.Ilamurugu, Hony. Treasurer, Gandhi Nagar Club, 4.R.S.Varadarajan, Chairman, Disciplinary Committee, Gandhi Nagar Club, 5.K.Balasubramaniam, Member, Disciplinary Committee, Gandhinagar Club.

6.Srinivas A Naidu, Member, Disciplinary Committee, Gandhi Nagar Club,

7.Arun Kumar, Guesthouse Employee, Gandhinagar Club Respondents 2 to 7 having office at:

No.73, B.Ramachandra Adhithanar Salai, (Formerly 4th Main Road, Gandhi Nagar, Adyar, Chennai 600 020.

... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents for having produced the minutes dated 28.01.2019 before this Hon'ble Court and make believe the petitioner and this Hon'ble Court that the issues between the petitioner and respondent are resolved. However, 1st and 2nd respondents having passed proceedings dated 07.04.2019 contrary to its minutes dated 28.01.2019.

For Petitioner : Mr.Anil Relwani For Respondents : Mr.Sukumaran for R1 Mr.Krishna Srinivasan for M/s.Ramasubramaniam Associates for R2 and R7 Mr.Balachandran for R4 to R6

O R D E R

Mr.Sukumaran, learned counsel appearing for the Club has produced the letter addressed to the petitioner in this Contempt Petition withdrawing the suspension order passed on 07.04.2019.

2. In view of the said compliance, this Contempt Petition is closed as no further orders are necessary. No costs.

3. Mr.Balachander, learned counsel who claims to appear for the respondents 4, 5 and 6 who are claiming to be the Members of the Disciplinary Committee and Guardians of Discipline in the Club would contend that the 1st defendant is colluding with the petitioner and giving him entry through back door. It is open to the Members of the Disciplinary Committee who are so much concerned about the discipline in the Club, to initiate whatever proceedings they want as against the actions taken by the Club. SD/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES) DSA //Certified to be true copy// Dated at Madras this the day of 2019. COURT OFFICER(O.S.) from 25th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.

SM/20/06/2019