Madras High CourtREV.APPL/247/2015disposed of

The Government Of Tamilnadu v. Y.Indirani

2016-12-09Honourable Mrs Justice Pushpa Sathyanarayana,Honourable Mr Justice V. Parthiban,Honourable Mr Justice Huluvadi G. Ramesh4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 12/10/2015 C O R A M THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI and THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN Review Application No.247 of 2015 Periasamy ...

Petitioner Vs

1. The District Collector Salem District.

2. The Tahsildar Attur Taluk.

3. Periasamy

4. Dhanasekaran

5. Athiappan ...

Respondents Prayer: Review Application filed under Order 47 Rule 1 r/w Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 to review the order dated 11/8/2015 made in W.P.No.19093 of 2015.

For petitioner : Mr.T.Murugamanickam - - - - -

O R D E R

(delivered by SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI,J.,) The applicant, seeks a review of the order dated 11 August 2015, passed in W.P.No.19093 of 2015, whereunder, recording the averments made in the counter filed by the Tahsildar/second respondent to the effect that after giving due notice to the respondents 3 to 5 and the writ petitioner, final decision would be taken based on the present status and report the same to the first respondent, who is the competent authority to pass final orders in the issue herein, the Division Bench of this Court, disposed of the writ petition, with a direction to implement the decision taken by the Tahsildar within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of the said order.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the applicant/petitioner seeks a review only confined to the ground that he is also entitled to produce all the documents and opportunity of hearing before the decision is taken by the authorities.

3. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the considered view that it is not necessary to pass a fresh order as in the counter affidavit itself as aforestated, it is clearly stated that the

decision will be taken, after issuance of notice to the respondents 3 to 5 as well as the writ petitioner.

4. In view of the above, this Review Petition stands dismissed. No costs.

(SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI, J.) (K.K.SASIDHARAN, J.) 12 October, 2015 mvs.

Index: Yes/No To

1. The District Collector Salem District.

2. The Tahsildar Attur Taluk.

SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI, J.

and K.K.SASIDHARAN,J.

mvs.

Review Application No.247 of 2015 12/10/2015