A.Yuvaraj v. State Rep By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 04.08.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Crl.O.P.No.11534 of 2020 A.Yuvaraj M/A 25 years, (A-1), S/o.Arumugam, No.2/87, Pillaiyar Koil Street, Perumathur Post, Katpadi Taluk, Vellore District.

... Petitioner/A1 Vs.

The State represented by, The Inspector of Police, K.V.Kuppam Police Station, Vellore District. (Crime No. 338 of 2020) ... Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. to enlarge the petitioner/Accused on bail in the event of his arrest by the respondent police in Connection with the Crime No.338 of 2020, pending investigation on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.Ilayaraja Kandasamy For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

(The case has been heard through video conference) The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 379, 430 of IPC read with Section 21(1) of Mines & Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, in Crime No.338 of 2020, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was found in illegal transportation of two sack of sand by using two wheeler without valid licence. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and has been falsely implicated in this case. On instruction, he would further submit that without prejudice to his defence, the petitioner is prepared to

deposit considerable amount to any charitable Organization or Association. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner was transporting two bags of sand through two wheeler. He would further submit that there is no previous case. Hence he vehemently opposed for the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. In order to curb the illegal sand mining activities, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) as non refundable deposit to the "Chief Minister's Public Relief Fund, Indian Overseas Bank, Secretariat Branch, Chennai SB.A/c. No.117201000000070, IFSC Code. No.IOBA0001172" without prejudice to his rights and contentions before the trial Court.

6. Merely, because the petitioner deposits the said amount, it would not amount to admission of his guilt. Therefore, it is open to the trial Court to deal with the case independently.

7. Taking note of the facts and circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions :- [a] The petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) as non-refundable deposit either through RTGS/NEFT or in cash in favour of "Chief Minister's Public Relief Fund, Indian Overseas Bank, Secretariat Branch, Chennai SB.A/c. No.117201000000070, IFSC Code. No.IOBA0001172" within fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Thereafter, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail in the event of his arrest or on his appearance and on production of proof of deposit of the above amount and on further condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.

10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the police officer who intends to arrest, failing which the petition for anticipatory bail shall stands dismissed automatically and on further condition that the petitioner shall also give a letter of undertaking before the respondent/police that the said amount has been paid in respect of particular crime number.

[b] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the respondent/police may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[c] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police every Monday and Friday at 10.30 am until further orders. [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[e] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner is released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

8. With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is ordered.

9. For reporting compliance, post on 25.08.2020. -sd/- 04/08/2020 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KATPADI 2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, K.V.KUPPAM POLICE STATION, VELLORE DISTRICT.

4 THE SECRETARY THE CHIEF MINISTERS PUBLIC RELIEF FUND, INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK, SECRETARIAT BRANCH,CHENNAI CC to M/S. ILAYARAJA KANDASAMY Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.11534/2020 Date :04/08/2020 RD 28/08/2020