The Special Tahsildar, v. Muthukumarasamy,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATE : 08.03.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR A.S.No.945 of 2010 MP.Nos.1 of 2010 and 1 of 2011 The Special Tahsildar, (Adi Dravidar Welfare) Kallakurichi, Villupuram District.

... Appellant

Versus

Muthukumarasamy, S/o. Muthusamy, Arulampadi Village, Sankarapuram Taluk, Villupuram District.

... Respondent Prayer:- This Appeal suit has been filed under Section 54 of land Acquisition Act against the judgment and decree passed in LAOP.No.22 of 1996 on the file of the learned Sub Court, Kallakurichi dated 30.4.2009.

For Appellant : No Appearance For Respondent : No Appearance

J U D G M E N T

There was no representation for the appellant on the last hearing, i.e. 06.3.2017. Today, when the matter was called in the morning, there was no representation for the appellant. However, in the interest of justice, the case was passed over by 2.30 p.m. Even at 2.30 p.m, there was no representation for the appellant. Therefore, I am of the view that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently, connected https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To The Subordinate Judge, Kallakurichi Copy to: The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras 104 sv(CO) md(17/03/2017) AS.No.945 of 2010 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/