Royappan v. R.Kanagaraj
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 24.8.2015 Coram THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B. RAJENDRAN Crl.Revision Case No.1024 of 2013
1. Royappan
2. Mayilsamy
3. Meenakshi .. Petitioner
Versus
1. R.Kanagaraj
2. Sub Collector cum Sub Divisional Magistrate Pollachi, Coimbatore District .. Respondents Revision Petition filed under Sections 397 read with Sec. 401 of Cr.P.C. to set aside the Order in Na.Ka.No.501/2013/A1, on the file of Sub Collector cum Sub Divisional Magistrate, Pollachi, dated 07.8.2013.
For Petitioner :
Mr.M.N.Balakrishnan For R1 :
Mr. B.Ramamoorthy For R2 :
Mr. V.Arul, Government Advocate
ORDER
Today when the matter is taken up the learned Government Advocate appearing for the second respondent / complainant submitted that the encroachment has been removed in the land in question and the same has been used as common pathway.
2. Recording the submission of the learned Government Advocate, the Criminal Revision case is closed as nothing survives in the petition. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar True Copy Sub Assistant Registrar ga To https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
1. 2. Sub Collector cum Sub Divisional Magistrate Pollachi, Coimbatore District
2. The Public Prosecutor, Madras.
1 cc to Mr.M.N.Balakrishnan , Advocate Sr.No.44878 1 cc to Mr. B.Ramamoorthy, Advocate Sr.No.45273 Crl.R.C. No.1024 of 2013 ts(co) pmk.18.9.2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/