Kumaresan v. The Inspector Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 14.06.2021

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI Crl.O.P.No.9732 of 2021 Kumaresan ... Petitioner Vs.

The State rep.by its The Inspector of Police, Singarapettai Police Station, Krishnagiri District.

(Cr.No.91 of 2021) ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original petition has been filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C prayed to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.91 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.V. Vijayakumar For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

ORDER

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294 (b), 323, 392, 506(i) in Crime No.91 of 2021, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.Totally there are three accused in this case, the petitioner herein arrayed as A2. The case of the prosecution in that the petitioner along with other accused prevented the defacto complainant complainant, who is an Inspector of police from doing his public duty and destroyed his mobile phone worth Rs. 15,800/- Hence, the law enforcing agency registered a case against the petitioner. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He would also submit that the co-accused has been granted anticipatory bail by this Court. However on instructions he would further submits that without prejudice to their defence and contentions, the petitioner is ready to deposit a sum of Rs.40,000/- in favour of District Medical

Officer, Government Hospital, Krishnagiri District" for treating Covid19 patients. Therefore, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) opposed the grant of anticipatory bail by stating that the petitioner prevented the defacto complainant complainant, who is an Inspector of police from doing his public duty and destroyed his mobile phone worth Rs. 15,800/-.

5. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of the petitioner and also the fact that the petitioner has willfully and on his own volition agreed to pay cost to any charitable institution as imposed by this Court, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

(a) the petitioner shall to deposit a sum of Rs.40,000/- (Rupees forty Thousand Only) as non-refundable deposit either through RTGS/NEFT or in cash/demand draft in favour of " District Medical Officer/Authorised Officer, Government Hospital, Krishnagiri for treating Covid-19 patients and produce proof of such payment of the above amount to the Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai , at the time of release on bail;

(b) the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Court concerned may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

(c) the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required.

(d)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(e)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(f)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court

in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; (f)if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

-sd/- 14/06/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, UTHANGARAI 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE KRISHNAGIRI [FOR INFORMATION].

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SINGARAPETTAI POLICE STATION, KRISHNAGIRI DISTRICT.

4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

5 THE DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER/AUTHORISED OFFICER, GOVERNMENT HOSPITAL, KRISHNAGIRI +1 CC to V.VIJAYAKUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO. 6493 CRL OP.9732/2021 Date :14/06/2021 MN-01/07/2021