Veenaitherthal v. Fci Employees Co-Operative House Building Society,

A.No.2034 of 2022 in C.S.No.888 of 2007 A.No.2034 of 2022 in C.S.No.888 of 2007 N.SESHASAYEE.J., Learned counsel for the applicant produced the original sale deed in favour of the applicant dated 12.03.2008. The said document indicates that the applicant had purchased 13 cents and 217 sq. ft., out of 3.905 acres in Survey No.732. 2.Her grievance is that notwithstanding the fact that the said property was purchased by her on 12.03.2008, it was wrongly attached vide order of this Court dated 01.09.2009 in A.No.1540 of 2008 in C.S.No.888 of 2007. 3.This Court perused the papers and finds that the order of attachment before judgement passed in A.No.1540 of 2008 in C.S.No.888 of 2007 was communicated to the Registrar concerned on 18.11.2009. 4.It is apparent that the property purchased by the applicant vide sale deed dated 12.03.2008 and registered as Document No.1321 of 2008 on the file of Vadavalli Sub Registrar Office is not liable to be attached. Hence, this Court has little hesitation in raising the attachment passed by this Court vide order dated 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

A.No.2034 of 2022 in C.S.No.888 of 2007 N.SESHASAYEE.J., Anu 01.09.2009 in A.No.1540 of 2008 in C.S.No.888 of 2007 prior to the suit only to the extent of the property purchased by the applicant vide Document No.1321 of 2008 dated 12.03.2008 on the file of Vadavali Sub Registrar. 5.This application is allowed on the above terms. 02.03.2023 (1/2) Anu A.No.2034 of 2022 in C.S.No.888 of 2007 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis