Praveen Kumar G. v. Nivedita
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twenty Eighth day of June Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.8177 of 2022 in Crl.R.C.No.793 of 2022 PRAVEEN KUMAR G [ PETITIONER/APPELLANT/ACCUSED ] Vs NIVEDITA [ RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT ] REP BY HER POWER OF ATTORNEY AGENT, P.VENKATESH Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to grant exemption to the petitioner from surrendering before the trial court in pursuance to the judgment of conviction and sentence passed by the XIX Metropolitan Magistrate, Allikulam, Egmore, Chennai in C.C.No.3839 of 2017 dated 27.02.2020 as confirmed by the XXI Additional Sessions Judge, Chennai in C.A.No.97 of 2020 dated 05.01.
2022, pending disposal of the main Crl.R.C.No.793 of 2022. Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.CHENNAI LAW ASSOCIATES, Advocate for the petitioner the court made the following order:- This petition is filed to exempt the petitioner from surrendering before the trial Court in pursuance to the judgment of conviction and sentence passed by the XIX Metropolitan Magistrate, Allikulam, Egmore, Chennai in C.C.No.3839 of 2017 dated 27.02.2020 as confirmed by the XXI Additional Sessions Judge, Chennai in C.A.No.97 of 2020, dated 05.01.2022, pending the disposal of the Criminal Revision Case.
2.I have perused the petition filed for exemption and I am not satisfied with the reasons mentioned in the application. 3.The Judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Surya Baksh Singh Vs. State of U.P.1, has held in paragraph No.25, which reads as follows:- "The routine is to file an appeal, apply and get enlarged on bail or get exempted from surrender, and thereafter wilfully to become untraceable or unresponsive. It is the bounden duty cast upon the Judge not merely to ensure that an innocent person is not punished but equally not to become a mute spectator to the spectacle of the convict circumventing his conviction." Similarly, in the Judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, in Vivek Rai v. High Court of Jharkhand2, in paragraph No.
3, has held as hereunder:- "We do not find any merit in the challenge to the validity of the Rule. It is well-known practice that generally a revision against conviction and sentence is filed after an appeal is dismissed and the convicted person is taken into custody in the Court itself. The object of the Rule is to ensure that a person who has been convicted by two courts obeys the law and does not abscond. The provision cannot thus be held to be arbitrary in any manner. The provision is to regulate the procedure of the Court and does not, in any manner, conflict with the substantive provisions of Cr.P.C., relied upon by the petitioners."
Therefore, this Court is of the opinion that in a routine manner, exemption from surrender cannot be granted.
4.In this case, there is no special and acceptable reasons assigned in the application for grant for exemption from surrender. Therefore, the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition for exemption shall stand dismissed. However, one more opportunity is granted to the petitioner to surrender before 05.07.2022.
-sd/- 28/06/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO 1 THE METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, NO.XIX, ALLIKULAM, EGMORE, CHENNAI.
2 THE CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, EGMORE, CHENNAI. [FOR INFORMATION] 3 XXI ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, CHENNAI.
C.C. to M/S.CHENNAI LAW ASSOCIATES Advocate on payment of necessary charges Order in CRL MP.8177/2022 in Crl.R.C.No.793 of 2022 Date :28/06/2022 From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format RW-04/07/2022