← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/9295/2021granted

R.Semalar v. State Rep. By

2021-05-27Honourable Mrs Justice T.V.Thamilselvi3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 27.05.2021

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI Crl.O.P.No.9295 of 2021 R.Semalar ... Petitioner Vs.

State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Thirunallar Police Station, Karaikal District, Pondicherry.

(Crime No.21 of 2021) ... Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C., praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.21 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner: Mr. P.Muthamizhselvakumar For Respondent: Mr.Bharatha Chakravarthy Government Advocate(Crl side) Pondicherry.

O R D E R

The petitioner who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 409 of IPC in Crime No. 21 of 2021, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution that the petitioner who is the Post Master at Surakudi, Karaikal has misappropriated the amount to the tune of Rs.91,550/- from various depositors during her service in the postal department. Hence the complaint.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and she did not involve in any misappropriation as alleged by the prosecution. Further he submitted that she has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), Pondicherry appearing for the respondent submitted that the petitioner misappropriated the amount from the savings of various customers and

depositors in the post office during her service. Hence, vehemently opposed to grant Anticipatory Bail to the petitioner, but admits that she is under suspension and the amount has also been repaid by the petitioner.

5. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the petitioner is a Central Government servant and is residing at Nagapattinam District within 20 Kms from Karikal, there is no possibility of absconding and also the misappropriated amount was repaid by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on her appearance, within a period of four weeks from the date of normal functioning of the Court below, (i.e.,) before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Karaikal, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that: [a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

[c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[f] If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

-sd/- 27/05/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.II, KARAIKKAL 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE PUDUCHERRY(FOR INFORMATION) 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUNALLAR POLICE STATION, KARAIKAL DISTRICT, PONDICHERY.

4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PUDUCHERRY CC to M/S.P.MUTHAMIZHSELVAKUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.9295/2021 Date :27/05/2021 RVR 05/07/2021