Nachammal v. Veerammal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 26.09.2016

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU Second Appeal No.576 of 2008 1.Nachammal 2.Suguna 3.Minor Saranya 4.Minor Sahana (Minor 3 and 4th appellant is rep. by their mother 2nd appellant) ... Appellants vs.

1.Veerammal 2.Mohan Raj

...Respondents

Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C. against the judgment and decree passed by the learned Sub-Judge, Pollachi, dated 05.03.2007 in A.S.No.13 of 2006 by confirming the judgment and decree passed by the learned District Munsif, Pollachi in O.S.No.122 of 2000 dated 06.10.2005. For Appellants : Mr.C.Veeraraghavan For Respondents : Mr.S.Kadarkarai

J U D G M E N T

Learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the appeal as the matter is settled out of court. He has made an endorsement to that effect. Accordingly, the second appeal is dismissed as settled out of court. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS II) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To 1.The Sub Court, Pollachi.

2.The District Munsif, Pollachi.

+1CC TO Mr.S.Kadarkarai, Advocate Sr.No.54938 S.A.No.576 of 2008 (CO)VSN CP(20/10/2016) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/