Vignesh v. State Rep By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 07.08.2020 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Crl.O.P.No.11710 of 2020 Vignesh ... Petitioner Vs.

The State rep. By The Inspector of Police Moranam Police Station Thiruvannamalai District.

(Crime No.760 of 2020) ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 438 of Criminal Procedure Code to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in connection with Crime No.760 of 2020 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Ms.B.Sudha For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

(The case has been heard through video conference) The petitioner who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324, 307, 506(2) of IPC in Crime. No.760 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution as per the defacto complainant is that on 08.05.2020 due to money dispute, the petitioner along with other accused attacked the defacto complainant and caused injuries on his head and shoulder. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case since, he happens to be known to the other accused. He further submitted that co-accused has been granted bail. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner is arrayed as A3 in this case and he has got one previous case of Section 302 IPC to his credit. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5. Taking into account of the facts and circumstances and the antecedent of the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed.

-sd/- 07/08/2020 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, CHEYYAR 2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

3 INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MORANAM POLICE STATION, TIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT.

CC to M/S. B.SUDHA Advocate on payment of necessary charges Sr.5897 CRL OP.11710/2020 Date :07/08/2020 RVR 09/09/2020 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/