← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/9371/2021dismissed

Akbar @ Akbar Ali v. State Rep. By

2021-05-26Honourable Mrs Justice T.V.Thamilselvi4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 26.05.2021

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI Akbar @ Akbar Ali, S/o.Shakul Hameed No.39/51, Periyasami Street, Coimbatore South, Sugunapuram, Coimbatore District.

... Petitioner Vs.

State Represented by The Inspector of Police, Kunaimuthur Police Station, Erode District.

Cr.No.334 of 2021.

... Respondent Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.334 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioners : Mr.S.N.Arun Kumar For Respondent : Mr.A.Damodaran Government Advocate (Crl. side)

O R D E R

The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 324 and 506(ii) of IPC and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Woman Act, 2002, in Crime No.334 of 2021, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused who are none other than the husband and brother-in-law of the defacto complainant abused her in filthy language and stabbed her with knife. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and the defacto complainant has lodged a false complaint against him. Therefore, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit that the petitioner and along with the other accused abused the defacto complainant and attacked her with knife. Hence he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5. Considering the above fact and circumstances of the case and the nature of allegations against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 26.05.2021 Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Speaking/Non-Speaking order ub

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

ub To

1. The Judicial Magistrate No.VII Coimbatore.

2. The Inspector of Police, Kuniamuthur Police Station, Erode District.

3. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai.

Crl.O.P.No.9371 of 2021 26.05.2021