V.Jaya And 4 Others v. Dr.M.Palanisamy

Contempt Petition Nos.1052 & 1060 of 2023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 07.11.2024

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Contempt Petition Nos.1052 & 1060 of 2023 1.V.Jaya 2.C.Indumathi 3.V.Chitra 4.K.Govindaraj 5.R.Suguna .. Petitioners in Cont.P.No.1052 of 2023 1.A.Narayanasamy 2.S.Dhinakaran 3.M.Gopikrishnan 4.C.Sasikumar .. Petitioners in Cont.P.No.1060 of 2023

Versus

M.Palanisamy .. Respondent in both cases Prayer: Petitions filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971 to punish the respondent for willful disobedience of orders dated 27.09.2022 and 26.09.2022 respectively passed by this Court in W.P. No.25791 & 25679 of 2022.

For petitioners in both cases :

Ms.C.Uma For respondent in both cases :

Mr.R.Neelakandan, Additional Advocate General for Mr.C.Kathiravan https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/2

Contempt Petition Nos.1052 & 1060 of 2023 ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

vga

ORDER

It is submitted by the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent/ Teachers Recruitment Board that the interim order granted by the Division Bench of this Court is still in force. Under the interim order granted by the Divsion Bench of this Court, the order, which is the subject matter of these contempt petitions, was directed to be kept in abeyance.

2.Since the interim order is still in force, no useful purpose would be served by keeping these contempt petitions pending. After recording the fact that in W.A. No.2035 of 2024, the Division Bench of this Court had directed that the order, which is the subject matter of these contempt petitions, is to be kept in abeyance, these contempt petitions are closed. 3.Liberty is granted to the petitioners to revive these contempt petitions in case the petitioners succeed in the Writ Appeal. 07.11.2024 vga Contempt Petition Nos.1052 & 1060 of 2023 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/2