Madras High CourtWP/701/2013dismissed for nonprosecution

B.L.Nirmaladevi, v. State Bank Of India,

2018-09-05Honourable Mr Justice S.M. Subramaniam2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 05.09.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.701 of 2013 B.l.Nirmala Devi ..Petitioner Vs.

1.State Bank of India, rep. By its Chairman/Managing Director, State bank Bhavan, Central Office, 8th Floor, Madame Cama marg, Mumbai, Maharashtra-400021.

2.The Chief General manager, State Bank of India, Local Head Office, No.16, College Lane, Nungambakkam, Chennai-6. 3.The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Selaiyur Branch, No.959, Velacherry Road, Selaiyur - 600 045.

..Respondents Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any appropriate writ, direction or order in the nature of a Writ, Directing the respondents to return all the title deeds relating to the property Viz., "First Floor Flat, facing Eastern side at "Madeena Iniya Illam", Plot No.21, V.G.P. Mathina Nagar, Door No.26, Maniyammai street, Kamarajapuram, Chennai-600 073, having a gross plinth area of 520 sq.ft., comprised in survey No.20/6 Part, Rajakilpakkam Village, Tambaram Taluk, kancheepuram District" to the petitioner, within the time fixed by this Hon`ble Court.

For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.C.P.R.Kamaraj Government Advocate for R1 to R3 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

O R D E R

When the writ Petition was listed for hearing on 30.08.2018, none appeared on behalf of the writ petitioner. The case was listed under the caption "for dismissal" on 03.09.2018. On that day also, there was no representation on the side of the writ petitioner. In order to give one more opportunity, again the matter was listed under the caption "for dismissal" on 05.09.2018. Today (05.09.2018), when the matter was called, none appeared for the writ petitioner.

2.In the light of the fact that there was no appearance on behalf of the petitioner, it is evident that the petitioner is not willing to get along with the matter and therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

Sd/- Deputy Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar W.P.No.701 of 2013 GSP(20/09/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/