Saravanan v. The State Rep.By Its

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 26.05.2021

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI Crl.O.P.No.9548 of 2021 Saravanan ... Petitioner Vs.

The State Rep. by its ... Respondent Inspector of Police, Kalasapakkam Police Station, Thiruvannamalai District.

(Cr. No.207 of 2021 ) Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C., praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.207 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.E.Sathiyaraj For Respondent : Mr.A.Damodaran Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side)

ORDER

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 379 and 430 of Indian Penal Code r/w Section 21(5) of Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957, r/w Section 3 of TN Public Property (PRVNT OF DAMAGE & LOSS) Act, 1992, in Crime No.207 of 2021, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner is alleged to have transported one and half unit of sand illegally. Hence, a case was registered against the petitioner.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent would submit that the petitioner has transported one and half unit of sand in Bolero Maxi Truck without getting any permission from the Government. He would further submit that there is no previous case pending against the petitioner.

5. This Court is of the opinion that the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) as non refundable deposit to the credit of the District Legal Service Authority, Thiruvannamalai District, without prejudice to his rights and contentions before the trial Court. Merely, because the petitioner has deposited the said amount, it would not amount to admission of their guilt. Therefore, it is open to the trial Court to deal with the case independently.

6. Taking note of the facts and circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) as non refundable deposit to the credit of the District Legal Service Authority, Thiruvannamalai District, within a period of four weeks from the date of normal functioning of the Court below and on such deposit the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Kalasapakkam, Tiruvannamalai District, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.

10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that: [a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[b] the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

[c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court herself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

-sd/- 26/05/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE DISTRICT MUNSIF-CUM-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KALASAPAKKAM, TIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TIRUVANNAMALAI. [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KALASAPAKKAM POLICE STATION, THIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT.

5 THE DISTRICT LEGAL SERVICE AUTHORITY, THIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT.

6 THE SECRETARY, TAMIL NADU STATE LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

+1 CC to M/S.E.SATHIYARAJ Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO.6300 CRL OP.9548/2021 Date :26/05/2021 TA-23/06/2021