Madras High CourtWP/17433/2016dismissed

Dr.Kamaraj, v. The Member Secretary,

2018-03-26Honourable Mr Justice R.Subbiah,Honourable Mr Justice P.D.Audikesavalu3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 26.03.2018 Coram The Hon'ble Mr.Justice R.Subbiah and The Hon'ble Mr. Justice P.D.Audikesavalu W.P.17433 of 2016 Dr. Kamaraj, rep. by his Power Agent, R. Kanagasabapathy District and Sessions Judge (Retd).

...Petitioner

Vs.

1. The Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, 1, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Madras-8.

2. The Principal Secretary and Commissioner, The Corporation of Chennai, Rippon Building, Madras -3.

3. The Executive Engineer, Zone XV, 15 Sholinganallur, Madras - 119.

4. The Secretary to Government, Housing and Urban Development, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009.

5. The Superintendent Engineer, Tanged Co. K.K. Nagar, Chennai - 78.

6. Sheeju Purushothaman,

7. M.P.Purushothaman

...Respondents

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a writ of mandamus, to direct respondents 1 t 3 to demolish the illegal construction put up by the sixth and seventh respondents in Plot Nos.15, 16, and 18 at Survey No.79/2A, in Neelangarai Village.

For Petitioner : Ms. R. Sri Priya for Mr. V.Raghavachari For Respondents 1, 3 & 5 : Mr. R. Arunmozhi Standing Counsel For Respondent-2 : Mr.A.Nagarajan For Respondent-4 : Mr. S.N.Parthasarathy Government Advocate For Respondents 6 & 7 : Mr.M.Deivanandam

O R D E R

(Order of the Court was delivered by R.Subbiah,J.) It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the dispute involved in the Writ Petition has been settled between the parties (viz., petitioner and the sixth respondent). Hence, he seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect on the reverse of this Writ Petition today, which is quoted infra:- "It is submitted that the dispute between the petitioner and the sixth respondent with regard to the reduction of the compound wall height and access has been settled."

2. Recording the said submission made by the learned counsel coupled with the endorsement, the Writ Petition is dismissed as settled out of Court. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(Audit) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar