S. Sathya v. The Highways Department,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 19.04.2018

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M. DHANDAPANI W.P.No.30202 of 2006 and M.P.No.2 of 2006 S.Sathya ... Petitioner Vs.

Highways Department Rep.by its Divisional Engineer Nabard and Rural Works Division Chengalpet.

... Respondent Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the proceedings of the respondent published in State Tender Bulletin dated 17.08.2006 at page 24, in item 34 and quash the same in so far as Serial No.9 of the tender publication and consequentially directing the respondent to proceed with the original tender called for in tender publication No.4/2005-2006/Va.Tho.Aa dated 31.01.2006 in accordance with law.

For Petitioner : Mr.K.M.Vijayan Senior counsel For M/s.La Law For Respondent : Mr.K.Ravikumar Additional Government Pleader

O R D E R

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the relief sought for in the Writ Petition has become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. Recording the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS II) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

raja To The Divisional Engineer Highways Department Nabard and Rural Works Division Chengalpet.

+1cc to Government Pleader Sr.No.30375 PVS(CO) sm:11.5.2018 W.P.No.30202 of 2006 and M.P.No.2 of 2006 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/